ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    .eu and Europe too The selection of the .eu TLD Registry
    posted by michael on Tuesday October 08 2002, @02:45AM

    philipperodhain writes "On 3 September 2002 the European Commission published in the Official Journal of the European Communities a "CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST FOR THE SELECTION OF THE .eu TLD REGISTRY"."



    Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No. 733/2002, which came into force on 30 April 2002, defines the future Registry as follows:

    - "The entity entrusted with the organisation, administration and management of the .eu TLD including maintenance of the corresponding databases and the associated public query services, registration of domain names, operation of the Registry of domain names, operation of the Registry TLD (Top Level Domain) name servers and dissemination of TLD zone files".

    The aim of this call for expressions of interest is to solicit applications from organisations interested in participating as candidates for the Registry selection procedure. The ongoing procedure is established on an open call according to the European principles of objectivity, non-discrimination and transparency.

    To be eligible, the applicant must fulfil all eight criteria, namely: (i) quality of service (i.e. capacity to manage the .eu), (ii) human and technical resources (qualified personnel), (iii) stability of financial standing, (iv) consultation mechanisms (in relation to the Community and national authorities), (v) representation before and involvement with the international authorities, (vi) impact on the domain name marketplace (compliance with the competition rules), (vii) implementation mechanisms for public policy provisions, and (viii) consideration of the European Environment Agency (E.E.A.) countries and European Union (EU) enlargement.

    · Quality of service

    The applicants have to show their capacity to organise, administer and manage the .eu TLD following the above EU principles. They primarily must describe the type of structure intended to be put in place and must demonstrate how they could achieve these Registry functions. They likewise have to put forward a possible registrar accreditation procedure, and to indicate means by which they would be able to ensure promotion of the .eu TLD particularly with respect to the EU linguistic diversity.

    This criterion is undoubtedly one of the most important elements in the process of selecting the future Registry. Indeed it will be marked with a maximum of 30 points whereas the other criteria will vary mainly between 5 to 20 points. It is clear that the Commission is very concerned that the highest degree of service should be provided by the Registry to ensure its ultimate success.

    · Human and technical resources

    This requirement is to ensure that the future Registry will be able to operate an effective registration management system as well as to cope with urgent day-to-day problems while maintaining a high level of reliability, precision and efficiency, as required by I.C.A.N.N. (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers).

    · Financial standing

    The applicants also need to have a sound financial basis. Accordingly, the quality of the business plan will be taken carefully into account and will be thoroughly analysed by the Commission. Indeed, the contract between the Commission and the Registry will be for a 5-year period which implies that the Registry must show that it can maintain its financial strength to weather whatever contingencies that may appear during this time. In any case the Commission will not provide for needs of the Registry.

    · Consultation mechanisms

    The applicants must demonstrate a skilful way of communicating with other interested parties, public authorities and organisations in particular from the Internet community, and with stakeholders.

    This requirement recognizes the fact that the global network is constantly evolving so that to maintain its competitiveness the Registry must be prepared to consult and to take into consideration views from interested parties.

    This criterion is also one of the most important conditions with a maximum of 30 points.

    · Representation

    The candidates should show how they intend to initiate and to maintain communication and involvement with international and regional Internet related organisations. It can be inferred from this that the EU wishes to be involved in the global network as a major "player" and to be party to the process of its own evolution.

    Nonetheless, the points allotted for this condition are negligible having the minimum threshold of 5 and a maximum of 10 points.

    · Impact on the domain name marketplace

    Consideration will be given to the expected impact that the candidate's proposal would have on competition in this marketplace.

    This requirement comes from the fact that the .euTLD should encourage the use of, and access to, the global network and the virtual marketplace by offering this new possibility of registering domain names alongside the existing ccTLDs (Country-Code Top Level Domains) and gTLDs (Generic Top Level Domains). To achieve this target, the applicants should include in their candidature the relevant data relating to the share of sales of members or stakeholders in similar registration activities regionally or globally.

    · Implementation mechanism for public policy provisions

    The Commission will adopt, after consultation with the Registry, several public policy rules. The purpose of these rules will be to establish the implementation and functions of the .eu TLD.

    The Commission will have to determine the public policy principles for the registration of .eu domain names in collaboration with the Registry as well.

    The applicants are thus strongly urged to identify options for the above rules and policy.

    Additionally, the applicants should indicate which options have been used to formulate the revenue-cost model included in the "financial standing" section.

    It is worth noting that this criterion will not only be scored on the basis of the quality of the policy option but also on the quality of the relationship between the revenue-cost model and alternative policy options.

    · E.E.A. countries and EU enlargement

    The candidates logically have to explain how they intend to take into account the forthcoming extension of the Regulation to E.E.A. countries and the potential extension to the countries currently applying to enter into the EU.

    The complete files are to be deposited with the Commission at the latest on 25 October 2002. The successful applicant will be invited to conclude a contract with the Commission for a 5-year period, renewable only once.

    Hence, the Commission has set a high passing mark in its efforts to establish a reliable, effective .eu in order to arouse consumer interest in the new ccTLD. In fact, the present challenge is to convince companies that a shorter, regional-specific domain name extension is far more valuable for branding targets than longer gTLDs (.com, .org, . net, .biz, .info, .net, etc).

    Furthermore with the introduction of the Euro currency last year, the EU is undoubtedly gaining a sound regional identity and cohesiveness not seen in other parts of the world. The forthcoming arrival of the .eu will provide EU's companies with the possibility of identifying themselves as European or pan-European companies on the global network. Accordingly, it can be reasonably expected that this new ccTLD will become of specific interest to companies that trade to different parts of the EU

    Copyright © 2002
    PHILLIPS ORMONDE & FITZPATRICK
    Philippe Rodhain
    Intellectual Property Lawyer

    philippe.rodhain@pof.com.au

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    The selection of the .eu TLD Registry | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 27 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: The selection of the .eu TLD Registry
    by yggdrazil on Tuesday October 08 2002, @04:56AM (#9632)
    User #3293 Info
    EEA != European Environment Agency

    EEA == European Economic Area, which is the 15 EU member states plus the three EFTA states Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, which together form the internal market.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: The selection of the .eu TLD Registry
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday October 08 2002, @05:12AM (#9635)
    User #2810 Info
    What marketing droid came up with this?:
    Hence, the Commission has set a high passing mark in its efforts to establish a reliable, effective .eu in order to arouse consumer interest in the new ccTLD. In fact, the present challenge is to convince companies that a shorter, regional-specific domain name extension is far more valuable for branding targets than longer gTLDs (.com, .org, . net, .biz, .info, .net, etc).
    And when? The EC made a similar statement over a year ago. Away back in the 20th century some people actually believed this stuff, but I suspect .eu, if it ever does get going, will be about as successful as .biz or .info, which is to say, not very. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .EU?
    by yggdrazil on Tuesday October 08 2002, @04:53AM (#9631)
    User #3293 Info
    In some aspects, the EU is a sort of a country. It has its own currency. Citizenship. Parliament. Courts, which have power over national courts. There is free movement within its borders, much more so inside the EU/EEA countries that make up the Schengen area. The EU is getting its own military forces, like the eurocorps and european rapid reaction force. The Eu tries to coordinate its foreign policy and monetary policy (eurozone countries).

    What you americans learnt in high school on how Europe works politically is most probably obsolete now. The EU internal market is quickly becoming the world's biggest/second biggest market. 18 countries now, with 10 more coming real soon now.

    With respect to RFC 1591, "EU" is a reserved countrycode on the ISO-3166 countrycode list. Which is what is needed to get a ccTLD.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: The selection of the .eu TLD Registry
    by yggdrazil on Tuesday October 08 2002, @10:15PM (#9669)
    User #3293 Info
    That may happen only after these countries has ceased to be souvereign countries, and are stricken from the ISO-3166 list.

    Which is unlikely to happen for the next 30-50-100 years.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .EU?
    by philipperodhain on Sunday October 13 2002, @01:56PM (#9724)
    User #3511 Info


    You should look into RFC 1591, which defines the dot eu as a reserved countrycode on the ISO-3166 ccTDL.

    Anyway, thank you for contributing to this debate.

    Philippe Rodhain

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com