ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • MŁller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ICANN Staff and Structure Enhancing Legitimacy in ICANN
    posted by michael on Friday September 27 2002, @09:03AM

    Anonymous writes "The Markle Foudation has published a new report, Enhancing Legitimacy in the Internet Corporation for Assigning Names and Numbers: Accountable and Transparent Governance Structures, authored by the Centre for Global Studies, University of Victoria."



    Here's what they say about it:
    The Markle Foundation released a September 2002 report by the Centre for Global Studies entitled "Enhancing Legitimacy in the Internet Corporation for Assigning Names and Numbers: Accountable and Transparent Governance Structures." The report outlines specific, proven guidelines, codes, approaches and best practices used by other international organizations which may be considered effective and appropriate for the governance and structure of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Its key recommendations focus on the core areas of Representation, Participation, Transparency and Accountability, providing specific suggestions for improvements to ICANN's "Blueprint for Reform" as well as an analysis of how best practices of other organizations can inform the debate over ICANN restructuring. The report underscores the ongoing nature of ICANNís reform--that future reviews of ICANN should be mandated, and the need for actively engaging its stakeholders-the public and private sectors, developed and developing countries and local, national, and international NGOs-in its operation and governance structure.

    Key Recommendations

    Representation: Geographical diversity (including developing countries) on the Nominating Committee and the Board should be increased by expanding application of the accepted concept of constituencies. The ICANN Board voting mechanisms for Bylaw amendments should be improved.

    Participation: Consultation before decisions should be expanded through early publication in the policy process, with opportunities for feedback by the public, including through regional seminars. The proposed Manager of Public Participation (MPP) should be supported by a formal ICANN Declaration or Charter. ICANNís Board should (a) declare its intent to hold regional workshops; (b) allow representatives of the At- Large community to participate at a session added to each Board Meeting; and (c) nurture the development of an active global network of interested parties.

    Transparency: Direct focus is needed on transparency issues separate but integral to accountability, such as disseminating information on decision-making and policy processes. ICANN should make available on its web site the contact information for each Board and staff member. Guidelines for future decision-making and policy development processes should be made available to the public.

    Accountability: The powers and independence of the Ombudsman Office should be enhanced and defined formally, and the Ombudsman Office should publish its annual report without prior Board review. Provisions of the Reconsideration and Arbitration processes should be strengthened to make them binding on the Board in certain cases. The Reconsideration Committee should be composed of two former Board members, rather than serving members, and independent representatives selected from a consumer protection organization. The Reconsideration Committee should be empowered to report on its activities and findings, including minority views, as frequently as it sees fit, with its reports made public as they are submitted. The Arbitration process should provide for parties to select among possible modes of arbitration, using a pool of pre-certified arbitrators, and be clearly defined in the Bylaws.


     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Enhancing Legitimacy in the Internet Corporation for Assigning Names and Numbers: Accountable and Transparent Governance Structures
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Enhancing Legitimacy in ICANN | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Enhancing Legitimacy in ICANN
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Friday September 27 2002, @10:51AM (#9440)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    They forgot:

    Accuracy: With the huge amount of un-needed structure for such a limited mandate, ICANN should strive to devote additional resources to counting the number of angels which can dance on the head of a pin.

    Sarcasm aside, they did forget the most important aspect: SIMPLICITY.

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: Enhancing Legitimacy in ICANN
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Saturday September 28 2002, @08:54AM (#9452)
    User #2810 Info
    Markle writes
    The Reconsideration Committee should be composed of two former Board members
    Robert Blokzijl and Michael Roberts, oh yeah, that will work. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com