ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Membership Issues GA Chair about-face on suicide [updated]
    posted by tbyfield on Sunday September 08 2002, @07:35PM

    A few months after protesting mightily that a General Assembly motion asking the DoC to re-bid ICANN's contract would be suicidal, GA chair Thomas Roessler seems to have endorsed the idea that the GA would, in fact, be better off dead. [Update: Thomas has provided a thorough response on his weblog, here. I'm skeptical about his emphasis that the ERC is moving in the right direction. Joanna Lane's more jaundiced assessment gets it right: whatever simulacrum of an open and/or public organ the ERC recommends (if any) will end up being watered down by malingerers like Esther Dyson. There are lots of ways to move; the ERC's three-card monte involving the GA and the ALAC isn't a good one. -- tbyfield]



    In a message to the GA discussion list, Roessler writes: "It looks like [ICANN's] Evolution and Reform Committee [ERC] is moving into the right direction as far as the GA is concerned." The ERC recommendation he cites reads, in part, as follows:
    [T]he existence of an effectively functioning ALAC [At Large Advisory Committee] might eventually eliminate or significantly reduce the need for and utility of a General Assembly. In our view, an effective ALAC would operate properly moderated mailing lists and the like, thus allowing wide-ranging public discussion of ICANN-related issues. Given this, there may be no need for a separate General Assembly.
    To be fair, it should be said that this passage (and what follows it) purport to take into account the "particularly useful ... recommendations made by [GA chair] Thomas Roessler and [GA alternate chair] Alexander Svensson" (available here). (And note: those remarks included a trenchant skepticism about what exactly is meant by "moderated," to say nothing of the ERC's mention of "properly moderated.") According to Roessler's and Svensson's own abstract of their recommendations:
    We do not believe that it makes much sense to reserve the GA to cross-constituency dialogue, and leave the dialogue with the public to some other, unspecified mechanism. The cost of that approach may quite easily outweigh the benefit. What the GA needs is not less participation from the outside, but more participation from the inside.
    A fine sentiment. Unfortunately, it's hard to imagine a better example of an "unspecified mechanism" than the ALAC -- part Rube Goldberg, part chimera -- imagined by ICANN's ERC, which has demonstrated its abiding hostility to ongoing formal public input into ICANN and its pseudo-processes. And the ERC all but admits as much:
    Since it will be some time, even if our recommendation to create it is accepted by the Board in Shanghai, before it is clear that the ALAC can in fact carry out this role, our current thinking is that the GNSO Council should maintain the operation of the current General Assembly discussion lists until such time as the ALAC has shown it can take over that responsibility, and at that time the responsibility for a general public discussion list on ICANN issues should be transferred to the ALAC. If this approach were followed, it would be unnecessary that there be such a thing as a General Assembly Chair. Of course, under this approach, the GNSO Council should have the power to designate the General Assembly list managers/moderators for the time it remains responsible for that list, and after that the ALAC would have this responsibility.
    Predictably, the ERC suggests that power (such as it is, in this context) would be transferred from elected representatives to interim appointees. "After that," they say, the ALAC would take over -- on a timetable and through a mechanism that, naturally, aren't specified.

    It isn't clear why Roessler would endorse this approach. We could have asked him, but given that in the past he has denounced this ICANN Watch editor for his "damned lies" and "newly improved skills in lying by omission," we thought it best to let him explain his own rationale -- in full.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • writes
  • ERC recommendation he cites
  • here
  • those remarks
  • damned lies
  • newly improved skills in lying by omission
  • motion asking the DoC to re-bid ICANN's contract
  • here
  • assessment
  • simulacrum
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    GA Chair about-face on suicide [updated] | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Roessler's Reply
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Monday September 09 2002, @04:17AM (#9125)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    Thomas Roessler has written a reply to the above.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com