ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    .org Old Internet Thinking RIP
    posted by michael on Friday August 30 2002, @07:13AM

    Carl Malamud, one of the sponsors of the IMS proposal for .org, has posted his response to ICANN's tentative decision to give .org to an as yet non-existent body to be created somehow or other by its good friends at ISOC. The essay demonstrates why IMS's hopes, and the rest of us probably, are doomed.

    See, the problem is that Malamud's entire essay is consumed with irrelevant Old Internet considerations like running code, technical merit, and whether it makes sense to evaluate a program without ever looking at it. This IETF-style approach to the problem of finding reasonable solutions to problems has no place in the Brave New Internet of today where expensive consulting firms decide that proposals produced by expensive consulting firms have the most merit, where merit is defined as producing familiar-looking paper. Only a dinosaur would have failed to notice that "the ICANN .ORG review mechanism literally restates the ICANN new open gTLD contract award order.". Only an ostrich would fail to see that ICANN has learned nothing and forgotten nothing from the gTLD rollout debacle. Recall that mere factual errors were no reason to upset the gTLD allocations.

    Read Malamud's essay. Don't miss the Grrrrrreat slides. Weep or gnash your teeth. There's not much else you can do now that the ICANN Board is preparing to undermine just about every form of outside accountability that might be brought to bear on it.



    It is possible to argue that ISOC will do a perfectly competent job on .org. It just won't have the lowest prices. And, if Malamud is to be believed (I am not competent to judge, but he is), it won't have the best technology. And it certainly won't do anything to increase competition in the market for providers of registry services. But you can't have everything, can you? And no doubt we'll have the comfort of knowing that .org is in safe and familiar hands as soon as ISOC actually gets around to telling us who will be involved in running this new corporation they are planning to set up Real Soon Now.

    I'd feel somewhat less bad about that argument if ICANN would release the data that might back it up. Unless of course the data show something else. Assuming it exists.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • release the data
  • response
  • tentative decision
  • "the ICANN .ORG review mechanism literally restates the ICANN new open gTLD contract award order."
  • mere factual errors were no reason to upset the gTLD allocations
  • Malamud's essay
  • Grrrrrreat slides
  • preparing
  • undermine just about every form of outside accountability
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Old Internet Thinking RIP | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 21 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Old Internet Thinking RIP
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Friday August 30 2002, @07:40AM (#8796)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    I'm certain that someone will blame me for bringing up the same topic again, but in my research of the past 9 months that I've been consulting on this topic, it comes up time and again.

    In this case, the topic takes the form of the realisation that IMC was treated in the same way as Image Online Design. In both cases they had sound technical plans and followed, as Michael says, the IETF tradition of showing good technical judgement, stable business plans, and an application with obvious merit. In both cases, they were passed over for an incumbant concern with less than desirable technical plans, no business model to speak of, and numerous blank holes in their application maked 'to be determined later'.

    It seems that once again ICANN ignores the pioneers with the experience and standing and gives the contract to the applicant who has the most inside ties.

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    This is probably a petty gripe, but...
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday August 30 2002, @08:13AM (#8800)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    in the essay, where he cites an ICANNWatch article, he links to it using the icannwatch.com address, instead of the icannwatch.org address that is preferred by the people who run the (noncommercial) site itself. This use of .org vs. .com for sites like this is one of the things that figures in my personal assessment of Cluefulness Quotient (CQ) of people or institutions. The less clueful types tend to type in .com for everything, whether commercial or not. Now, do you want somebody of that ilk to be in charge of managing the .org domain?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com