ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Registrars Dotster to challenge ICANN over WLS
    posted by michael on Thursday August 29 2002, @11:09AM

    GeorgeK writes "See the scoop here (DNSO Archives)."



    It's good to see that some registrars have a backbone, and are willing to challenge the Board's decision that was unsupported by consensus.

    [Editor's note: here's the text -mf]

    Dear Registrar Constituency Members,

    The recent decision by the ICANN Board to approve VeriSign’s WLS proposal is one that cannot go unchallenged. As a result, Dotster is currently formulating an appeal that will be submitted to the ICANN Reconsideration Committee within the next week. Dotster’s position regarding the WLS remains unchanged; we are against it in any form. Should our appeal to ICANN be rejected, we are fully prepared to exercise other legal remedies to stop the implementation of the WLS.

    I will not waste your time by elaborating why Dotster is against the WLS. Our position has been well documented both with ICANN and on our web site. The purpose of this e-mail is to formally announce our intentions to resist this decision with all the resources and actions that my small company can gather.

    Clint Page
    President
    Dotster Inc.,
    11807 NE 99th Street, Suite 1100
    Vancouver, WA 98682 USA
    Tel(360)253-2210;Fax(360)253-4234
    cpage@dotster.com

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • here
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Dotster to challenge ICANN over WLS | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Dotster to challenge ICANN over WLS
    by RFassett on Friday August 30 2002, @04:35AM (#8785)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    "Should our appeal to ICANN be rejected, we are fully prepared to exercise other legal remedies to stop the implementation of the WLS."

    To me, this is an interesting "If-Then" relationship. One of the reasons cited by the anti-WLS group favoring ICANN involvement in the actual implementation decision (by consensus or whatever) was that leaving such a decision purely to a court of law (i.e. ICANN makes no decision on the basis it is outside its scope) would take so long that by the time a final decision was reached with the court method, Verisign would have effectively placed its competitors out of the market place (personally, I found this an odd argument given the swiftness of the Smiley injunction).

    Now the question becomes, what would take longer, an ICANN reconsideration request or legal action? I suppose if the reconsideration decision has not been made by the WLS launch date, then the legal recourse would kick in? But, the Dotser announcement does not quite state such a "deadline" for reconsideration...certainly ICANN is not one to approach its work where establishing deadlines is considered an effective approach to its ability to make progress in its duties (unless one takes the approach that a non-decision IS indeed a decision). It would have been nice to see a deadline stated explicitedly here as part of Dotster's "If-Then" anouncement.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: Auction...
    by GeorgeK on Thursday August 29 2002, @12:42PM (#8764)
    User #3191 Info | http://www.kirikos.com/
    If Verisign had an auction instead, they wouldn't be making all that money from people who buy WLS slots on names that will never expire, such as Yahoo.com, Amazon.com, Sex.com, etc. That's where the real cash is going to be made, selling false dreams to the consumer.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com