ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Government Advisory Committee (GAC) Canadian Government asks for input on ICANN Reform
    posted by michael on Wednesday August 21 2002, @03:18PM

    fnord writes "The Government of Canada has released a position paper on ICANN reform and asked for input to be received by September 10. While the position paper claims to be similar to the GAC position, it is somewhat toned down and more reserved in its support of ICANN."



    While one might expect that the GAC and Government of Canada positions would be near identical, particularily given that Len St. Aubin (Senior Director, Business and Regulatory Analysis in the Telecommunications Policy Branch, Industry Canada; Industry Canada is a federal government department) has acted and is listed as a Vice Chair of the GAC, nevertheless the Canadian Government position paper diverges in some areas, taking more of a wait and see approach.

    This may be due to a shift in policy position by the Canadian Government, as Len St. Aubin no longer appears to be involved, he has apparently accepted a government posting to Europe in an unrelated position. I also wonder about his position as the ex-officio non-voting member of the CIRA .ca Board, as he is no longer listed in that position by name. Or it may be due to the fact that as St. Aubin is, or was, involved with CIRA from their inception, their more open, transparent, bottom up, democratic, consumer friendly, et cetera, policies rubbed off on him. Or it may be due to the fact that GAC representatives don't necessarily represent the views of their governments anyway. One recalls that at this year's ICANN meeting in Bucharest the GAC was peeved to receive critical documents from ICANN only hours prior to their being discussed, clearly not enough time to call home and receive definitive direction from one's government, even without the difference in time zones. I, as a citizen of Canada, certainly wasn't awoken from my bed by a call from my Government for any input on ICANN reform that was needed immédiatement et tout de suite.

    So let me see if I've got this straight. The GAC thinks ICANN is (just about) swell, except a high-ranking GAC member, or at least a former one, or at least that government that appointed him, may not be on the same page. And the citizens who elected that government may be on yet a different page, if their own ccTLD governance (which they also largely elect) is any indication. Not to mention, although I already have so will again, the GAC Chair has recently not only received funding from ICANN which calls his objectivity into question, indeed his very fitness for the position is suspect (not to worry, I predict he'll soon move on to fill M. Stuart Lynn's position, I hear the pay is better). Yet we are supposed to believe that GAC pronouncements are somehow a definitive distillation of the policy positions of the governments of the world.

    The long and the short of it is you can expect that this canuck will be giving his government an earful. -g

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • GAC
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • listed
  • listed
  • received
  • suspect
  • position paper
  • input
  • position
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Canadian Government asks for input on ICANN Reform | Log in/Create an Account | Top | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com