Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    ICANN Staff and Structure Incumbent Registry NeuStar Loves ICANN 'Reform'
    posted by michael on Friday August 09 2002, @05:01AM

    Supporting my thesis that the only friends ICANN has left are those who are employed by it or make money off it, incumbent registry NeuStar, which stands to lose a packet if its oligopolistic position as operator of one of the few ICANN-approved new TLDs were subject to competition from a horde of new entrants, has written to NTIA's Nancy Victory saying, NeuStar Supports ICANN's Blueprint for Reform. I don't suppose that this letter will hurt NeuStar in its bid to be the next .org registry, either. Unless the qualifiers to its support turn out to have teeth. Updated.

    Note, incidentally, the code phrases: NeuStar supports "ICANN’s statement of its Core Values, including in particular, the promotion of a sustainable competitive environment for gTLD Registries and ICANN-Accredited Registrars" -- that means not too much competition for Neustar, please. NeuStar does include a few qualifiers in its support,
    NeuStar also recognizes that the current system can and should be improved. ICANN needs to (i) reform its decision-making processes to provide for greater transparency and accountability, (ii) ensure that the views of all Internet stakeholders are heard, particularly those that are most impacted by the proposed ICANN policies (iii) create an effective advisory role for governments, and (iv) devise an adequate mechanism for the creation of sufficient financial and personnel resources to carry out its mission.
    It's hard to know what to make of this. On the one hand, one could read it as saying that NeuStar is just fine with the concept of not having end-user representation on the board if that is what its regulator (ICANN) wants. Might impact the business model. On the other hand, real transparency, real listening to persons impacted (e.g. end-users, registrants, would-be registrants, would-be registries), and real accountablility would be revolutionary developments. In the context of a letter entitled "NeuStar Supports ICANN Blueprint," though, it's hard to believe that NeuStar means these terms in their full-blooded state, and even harder to believe that Nancy Victory will read the letter as asking her to do something to achieve these ends. And without her (or Congress) it's unlikely to happen.

    UPDATE: I've had email from Jeff Neuman at NeuStar saying that what they meant by focusing on "the promotion of a sustainable competitive environment for gTLD Registries and ICANN-Accredited Registrars" was, (1) to distinguish themselves from the ccTLD debates and (2) to make the point that contrary to the VRSN position, NeuStar thinks some regulation [would that be anti-WLS -mf?] is needed to enhance competition.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • NeuStar Supports ICANN's Blueprint for Reform. I don't suppose that this letter will hurt NeuStar in its bid
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Incumbent Registry NeuStar Loves ICANN 'Reform' | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Incumbent Registry NeuStar Loves ICANN 'Reform
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday August 09 2002, @05:21AM (#8446)
    User #2810 Info
    The improvements NeuStar wants may be a milder echo of the points made by VeriSign and some US Republican Senators. If the WLS is approved, how long would it take for NeuStar to bring it? -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: Incumbent Registry NeuStar Loves ICANN 'Reform
    by RFassett on Friday August 09 2002, @07:06AM (#8449)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    As difficult as it might be to do so, imagine an environment where a system for adding new TLD's is in place and wholesale price de-regulation exists (the latter being what Verisign recently voiced as their specific concern with ICANN). The .biz TLD has already chosen its strategy being that of low wholesale pricing to influence a large volume of registrations. Basically, a strategy of competing head-to-head with .com for the same "business" target market without any real identifiable separation. This is the model they chose for their registry.

    If the projections submitted in October 2000 are now considered unrealistic for .biz, can you guess what their projections might look like today with price deregulation and new TLD's coming into the market place picking apart niche markets within .com? (note: serving a niche market is NOT the same as requiring restricted and/or sponsored TLD's for this purpose as the current applicants of .org each "say" in their application).

    New TLD's are not even on ICANN's agenda. For this reason alone, Neustar (and its registry model) is going to just lie down.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: Incumbent Registry NeuStar Loves ICANN 'Reform
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Sunday August 11 2002, @05:16AM (#8456)
    User #2810 Info
    Bret Fausett's icann.blog points out another everything is swell letter from NeuStar and the other newbie registries. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com