ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Verisign/NSI Verisign's WLS is dead (or should be): Names Council vote comments
    posted by jon on Wednesday July 24 2002, @04:16PM

    GeorgeK writes "For those who didn't have time to listen to the Names Council conference call and vote recorded at:
    http://www.dnso.org/dnso/mp3/ 20020724.NCteleconf.mp3
    it was interesting (the actual vote on WLS took place at 1 hour and 17 minutes into the MP3, for those who want to fast forward).

    The final report of the Transfers Task Force, see:
    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-transfer/ Arc00/msg00406.html
    which, on a CONSENSUS basis rejected WLS, was approved in full by the Names Council Board, with only the gTLD Constituency voting against it. Thus, the Names Council vote itself was a CONSENSUS majority against WLS."




    I believe that the ICANN board would be unwise to allow implementation of WLS, ignoring that vote of the Names Council and its constituencies, and also given the ability of negatively affected registrars to issue a challenge based on my comments at:

    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-transfer/Arc00/msg00303.html

    and also in the courts.

    I found it interesting to note the attempts by some Names Council members to exclude the ccTLD constituency voting on the WLS (which could have made it a non-consensus vote), saying that "WLS didn't affect them", among other arguments. I was appalled that they'd stoop to those levels, to disenfranchise a constituency once they were discovered to be anti-WLS (previously, I had thought the ccTLDs were pro-WLS, and I was pleasantly surprised that they did their homework and talked to their members, and reviewed all the arguments and came out against WLS). I echo the sentiments of another Names Council member who stated that if someone had a concern about a constituency's involvement in the Task Force, it should have been made ex-ante, not ex-post after their final position was made.

    Kudos to the Business Council members on the Board. If the GA disappears, I think that's the "team" I'd want to be on (they seemed to have the most logical and articulate members). I think Marilyn Cade deserves great thanks (from those both for AND against WLS) for doing a fantastic job taking input from all sides, especially given the time constraints involved.

    My predictions:

    1) WLS is denied by the ICANN Board by this time next week.
    2) SnapNames downsizes, and reduces its price for SnapBacks back to $49. I don't think they'll go bankrupt, as they have a great service, although it should not be a monopoly service in my opinion (thus my opposition to WLS). The downsizing would mostly affect the "political" employees of SnapNames (i.e. those mostly doing non-technical lobbying activities), so I don't see this as a bad thing, because those employees aren't truly "productive" in an economic sense, producing valuable goods and services for consumers. I expect them to end up with 15 or so employees, a tight group.
    3) SnapNames probably introduces an auction service for domain resellers/buyers to complement their SnapBacks (i.e. competing against GreatDomains and Afternic), and becomes the top auction marketplace. 4) Verisign renegotiates its R&D commitments of $200 million with ICANN, to save money (I think they can get it down to $100 million with not many people caring).
    5) The expired names marketplace sees more and more competition and innovation, with benefits to registrars and consumers.
    6) Verisign eventually gets bought out by IBM or Microsoft, for under $2 billion (2 or 3 year time frame). :)

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic /nc-transfer/Arc00/msg00303.ht ml
  • http://www.dnso.org/dnso/mp3/ 20020724.NCteleconf.mp3
  • http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic /nc-transfer/ Arc00/msg00406.html
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Verisign's WLS is dead (or should be): Names Council vote comments | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Verisign's WLS is dead (or should be): Names C
    by GeorgeK on Wednesday July 24 2002, @05:13PM (#8087)
    User #3191 Info | http://www.kirikos.com/
    It's Verisign's "Wait List Service" proposal. See the top of the ICANN WLS Forum for details.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com