ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    .org Who is the .org consultant?
    posted by tbyfield on Tuesday July 23 2002, @03:44AM

    Anonymous writes "Letter to Stuart Lynn

    Dear Stuart,

    On the very same day that you write to Nancy Victory, http://www.icann.org/correspondence/icann-to-doc-19jul02.htm reassuring the US Department of Commerce that you will take better account of the concerns of the various supporting organizations and advisory committees, you also had the gall to seek direct authorization from a 6 person, self-appointed, non-elected Committee that has all the powers of the full Board, but none of its checks and balances - for explicit permission to disburse more than a third of the .org application fees, some $125,000, to an independent consultant, the purpose of which is to "partly examine .org applications". All that cash and for only half the job?"



    The $125,000 this self-nominated, self-appointed, self-serving committee authorized you to spend were raised in fact from the future prospective unsuccessful applicants of .org. Were these impacted parties consulted before the decision was made to spend their money on this nameless, faceless consultant?

    http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-19jul02.htm

    And more important, who is "the consultant" exactly? Would it be correct to assume Joe Sims is connected in some way to this disbursement? What possible reason can there be to keep details of this engagement secret. Was the reason sufficiently compelling to ignore ICANN's founding principles of openness and transparency?

    How is such behavior by you and your Staff consistent with a bottom up policy development process? Consistent with the DoC directive? Why is this information not on the front page of the ICANN website, as New and Noteworthy?

    I think you owe the community an explanation, don't you?

    Sincerely,

    Joanna Lane

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Who is the .org consultant? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 21 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Who is the .org consultant?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday July 23 2002, @04:44AM (#8026)
    User #2810 Info
    I noticed that lack of disclosure too, but wondered less about Jones Day (that is, Joe Sims) and more about whom they might have picked to replace the Arthur Andersen consultants that ICANN used for the evaluation of new TLDs. These days the consultants could be otherwise discredited by the time they report, or they could already be discredited. If it is correct that Robert Blokzijl hasn't been re-(s)elected to ICANN's Board, perhaps they'll give it to him. I'm joking, but I suspect there will be controversy when the consultant is named. Finding a truly impartial outsider seems not to be something ICANN can manage. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Who is the .org consultant?
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Tuesday July 23 2002, @10:13PM (#8068)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    Love 'em or hate 'em (polarisation is popular these days, it seems), they are jsut doing their job. Sure, we would do it differently, but it's not our responsibility. It - currently, at least - is theirs. Let them get on with it. The more the screw up, the more chance ICANN will be rebid. The more they do the right thing, well, then that's good news.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Who is the .org consultant?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Tuesday July 23 2002, @06:35AM (#8036)
    User #2810 Info
    Now that is just about as absurd as it being Blokzijl, and therefore halfways believable coming out of the ICANN funhouse. Still, it would be nice if you could provide a credible reference for your assertion. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Who is the .org consultant?
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Tuesday July 23 2002, @07:17AM (#8040)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    It's not a big deal until the $125k is figured in. Then it becomes a big deal.

    Stuart: Hm, we need to find a use for this money, since we already know who we're going to approve.

    Louie: Well, Kent's been a good boy, let's throw him a bone.

    Kent: I know all. I see all. I tell nobody but you.

    Stuart: Okay, suits me. Here, Kent, here's $125k, craft me a report that gives the most favourable nod to you know who

    Kent: You know who? Karl Auerbach?

    Louis: No, you idiot, he's the other you know who. This is the you know who who gets .ORG.

    Kent: Oh, yeah, them.

    ++Peter

    (with the acknowledgement that I have no idea who the mystery consultant is. But I do think I know who you know who is)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Name of the boat
    by isquat on Tuesday July 23 2002, @01:40PM (#8057)
    User #3363 Info | http://i.squ.at/
    Invita invidia.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com