ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • MŁller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    .eu and Europe too The EU Weighs in on ICANN Reform
    posted by michael on Friday June 21 2002, @08:59AM

    The EU Telecommunications Council has endorsed guidelines for discussion concerning ICANN reform. Something for almost everyone here: ICANN should have a clear, limited, mostly technical mission; it shouldn't centralize power in the Board; the GAC should have a bigger (but not clearly defined) role, but governments won't pay for it. And, of course, the US ought to get out of managing the root.



    Guidelines For Discussions

    1. The ICANN Mission

    ICANN should have a clearly defined, limited and stable mission, giving priority to technical functions that are essential for the coordination and stability of the Internet. Certain existing activities could be reduced to improve that focus. Relevant legal and contractual work should be reduced to what is essential.

    The agreed definition should be adopted and revised by the Board by a substantial majority, after a GAC opinion.

    Bottom-up participation, transparency and consensus building should continue to be guiding principles of ICANŃs working methods. Excessive and unnecessary centralisation within ICANN processes should be avoided.

    In many cases, ICANNís mission impinges on public policy issues. In these cases GAC must play a stronger role in the decision making process (see point 4 below).

    2. The Public-Private Partnership

    The open public-private partnership, involving ICANN, governments and stakeholders in the Domain Name System (DNS), needs to be clarified.

    Government involvement with ICANN processes, which in areas impinging on public policy needs to be strengthened, should be through an enhanced relationship between ICANN and the GAC rather than through direct participation in ICANNís Board and Budget.

    Governments should satisfy themselves that the interests of other appropriate stakeholders are adequately recognised in the final structure.

    3. ICANN structure, membership and financing

    The private sector participants concerned are responsible for reaching mutually acceptable agreements regarding the structure of ICANN, its membership and financing and its decision-making processes. Due consideration should be given to the adequate protection of the public interest by strengthening the standing of GAC Advice.

    Such agreements, however, must give full weight to internationalisation, transparency and fairness and to maintaining the principle of geographic diversity and representation throughout the organisation. These agreements should be defined in such a way that the legitimate interests of each area of the world, and of their respective stakeholders, whether economic, legal or pertaining to public policies, could be duly taken into account.

    Governments should not contribute directly to ICANNís budget.

    4. Treatment of public policy issues

    Governments are responsible for public policy, not ICANN. Where ICANN's activities are likely to involve public policy implications, ICANN must consult the GAC. The GAC and ICANN should seek to define in advance which areas involve such implications. When there is an ICANN Board majority against a GAC advice, the matter must be further discussed in good faith between the ICANN Board and the GAC, with a view to reaching an agreement. Decisions taken by the ICANN Board against a GAC advice do not prejudice any steps governments may decide to take in order to protect the public interest. In all cases, ICANN should inform GAC on how its advice has been taken into account.

    5. The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)

    Governments agree that the GAC is the principal forum for the international discussion of public policy issues related to the ICANN mission and the Domain Name System. In this respect, Governments attach great importance to strengthening the role of GAC and ensuring its functional independence, in particular in the context of its partnership with ICANN.

    In order to effectively fulfil this role vis-ŗ-vis ICANN, GAC needs to work more effectively and be better integrated into the policy formulation process. This will require the necessary organisation and secretariat and in due course, if needed, a more appropriate legal structure. Governments should provide the necessary resources to this effect. In anticipation that other administrations will also make available such resources, the European Commission is also encouraged to allocate appropriate resources for this purpose. Responsibility for the GAC secretariat could thus be shared between several GAC participants. This secretariat would provide services to GAC both for policy making and logistics.

    GAC may seek the assistance of other qualified international entities for specific tasks or projects.

    6. Oversight of the Root Zone File and Reserve Powers

    The important issue of the transfer of powers relating to the management of the root server system from the United States' Department of Commerce to ICANN, under appropriate supervision, remains unresolved. Governments, in cooperation with the stakeholders concerned, should work towards internationalising the oversight role currently exercised by the United States government. The European Union should maintain a close political dialogue with the United States administration in order to facilitate an internationally acceptable outcome.

    In future reserve powers of last resort in the event of ICANN failing to fulfil its essential tasks and for the oversight of the maintenance of the authoritative Root Zone File could be exercised through the GAC or another appropriately constituted entity.

    Luxembourg, 18 June 2002

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • GAC
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    The EU Weighs in on ICANN Reform | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: The EU Weighs in on ICANN Reform
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Friday June 21 2002, @09:09AM (#7351)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    Of course the EU wants the US to step away from the root. Until and unless the US does so, the chances of .EU ever seeing the light of day are rather dim.

    Everyone has their self interest, and tries to cloud it in loftier issues.

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: The EU Weighs in on ICANN Reform
    by black-coffee on Thursday June 27 2002, @09:59PM (#7534)
    User #3402 Info | http://learn.tsinghua.edu.cn/homepage/009443/index.htm
    It is a clever way to emphasize the role of GAC in policy decision of ICANN.And it surely should be more effective in ICANN.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com