Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) ACCC obtains injunction against ING
    posted by michael on Wednesday May 08 2002, @02:29PM

    Anonymous writes "[Editor's note: Anonymous sent us the full text (below) of an order enjoining ING from doing a whole bunch of things, including suggesting that .bz " means or refers to 'business'". That part at least seems odd, since I'm pretty sure there's a lot of that sort of marketing going on....-mf]."

    The following is a transcript of the orders made by Ryan J. in the Federal Court on 6 May 2002:


    No. V 220 of 2002




    First Respondent

    Second Respondent


    JUDGE: The Honourable Justice Ryan
    DATE OF ORDER: 6 May 2002
    WHERE MADE: Melbourne


    Upon the first respondent, by its counsel, undertaking that until the hearing and determination of the proceeding, or until further order:

    (1) it will not in Australia or elsewhere, publish, distribute, or display material, by any means whatsoever (including electronic transmission and/or oral communications) in which it:

    (a) represents that the letters "bz" in the domain name ".bz" means or refers to "business";

    (b) represents that registration of a domain name in the ".bz" domain indicates the registration of a business;

    (c) represents that it has a pre-existing relationship with a person, if in truth it does not, in particular, by stating that there is such a relationship or by describing its notices as "Renewal Advices" or by an invitation to "confirm" a renewal or by addressing its notices to "accounts payable". The notices it sends to those persons to whom it does not have a pre-existing relationship will include the statement: "You do not have to renew your domain name registration through ING" (such statement to appear in the body of the text (in the same size and font as that text) on the front page of the notices);

    (d) represents that it has the authority itself, and itself can provide, the registration or renewal of a customer's domain name;

    (c) represents that it is offering multiple free services, if in truth it is not;

    (f) represents that it has a relationship with Melbourne IT that in truth it does not;

    (g) represents that it can register ".com.au" domain names on the internet for a period of more than two years;

    (h) represents that it is necessary for persons to have its assistance to obtain a registry key;

    (i) represents that an application for pre-registration of one of the names ".biz" or ".info" must be made through it;

    (j) represents that it is necessary to have access to a "registry key" before a domain name can be renewed, if in truth it is not;

    (k) represents there are no statutory warranties as to merchantability or fitness for purpose applicable to services it provides, alternatively that clause 3 of the First Respondent's Terms and Conditions Applying to Pre-Registration of Domain Names is capable of avoiding the effect of sections 68 and 74 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth);

    (2) any form it uses which bears the logo of Melbourne IT will be accompanied by a statement to the following effect: "This form will be submitted by us to Melbourne IT on your behalf", such statement to appear in the body of the text (in the same size and font as that text) on the front page of the notice which requests completion of the form;

    (3) it will preserve all records required to supply the information referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Motion, Notice of which is dated 17 April 2002.


    1. The Motion, Notice of which is dated 17 April 2002, be otherwise dismissed.

    2. Costs be reserved.

    3. The Directions Hearing be adjourned to 24 May 2002.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ACCC obtains injunction against ING | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 5 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ACCC obtains injunction against ING
    by fnord (reversethis-{moc.oohay} {ta} {k2yorg}) on Wednesday May 08 2002, @04:00PM (#6202)
    User #2810 Info
    The SPAM I received from the .bz ccTLD manager which I recently mentioned here, includes the statements:
    .BZ: Finally, the newest domain for businesses!

    For just $24.95, you can have a name that is synonymous with business.

    .BZ: A new address for business!

    It's.bz It's your business domain

    belizenic's homepage repeats the latter via a graphic, and its About Us and Services pages both state in part:
    Our top-level domain “.bz” is the top level domain indicator assigned to the country of Belize and is gaining great popularity as a generic domain designator for people doing business on the Internet “.bz means you are in BUSINESS!.
    This zdnet.com.au story from last February about an alleged cybersquatter also states:
    Earlier this week domain name provider Internet Name Group (ING) announced the launch of .bz in Australia. The country domain of Carribean nation Belize, ING has been touting it in Australia as an alternative for companies which missed out on .biz names.

    Mark Spektor, co-general manager at ING, believes a lot of corporates will take on .bz to protect their brand names.

    Earlier ICANNWatch coverage of ING can be found here. ING seems a longstanding bad actor, funny that many of their tactics now are being emulated by Veri$ign. Is this the same ING that forced Jeff Williams to change the name of his army of sockpuppets from ING to INeG? That would be too rich. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com