ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    The Big Picture A Radical Plan
    posted by michael on Thursday April 25 2002, @09:35AM

    Paul Hoffman sent an email 'round the world saying, "I have written a new paper" on the subject of ICANN and the administration of the DNS root "and would sincerely appreciate any comments you have on it."



    I've got a comment: I'm not real wild about idea that the Internet Society (ISOC) should be tasked with the critical function of selecting ICANN's successor, the proposed "TLD Secretariat". From where I sit, ISOC is pretty responsible for the way ICANN is now - the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Board are old ISOC-ers, and the ISOC/gTLD-MoU crowd has its fingerprints all over the place.

    So, while I like the general thrust of this paper, there's a lot of detail to haggle over.

    And I bet the ccTLDs would dispute the claim that they are inevitably identified with the goverments of the place they reside.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • a new paper
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    A Radical Plan | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 14 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    A radical return to monarchic forms of governance
    by circulation on Friday April 26 2002, @05:44AM (#6021)
    User #3335 Info
    So this is what it's come down to. Democracy is too expensive. Something along the lines of what ICANN has been (at times tacitly and often overtly) suggesting for quite a while now. Then, having reconciled ourselves to the notion that "Internet users don't need direct representation in the TLD naming process" we can merrily return to a monarchic form of governance for the DNS. I thought democracy was something we were supposed to work as hard as we could for, no matter how cumbersome or costly. Silly me.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: A Radical Plan
    by vasconcelos on Sunday April 28 2002, @05:16AM (#6065)
    User #3149 Info
    The reason why icann is entangled in domain name and trademark disputes is that the existing trademark legal system or legal systems don't work on the on-line environment. Much like the copyright.
    The colapse of a legal system is something that people tend to deny, specially when it is difficult to decide who should decide on the new one.
    Hence it would probably be a good idea to treat this subject under a distinct decision making process, from other icann issues
    Ana vasconcelos
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Not bad, except for point 5
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Thursday April 25 2002, @10:50AM (#5988)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    What legitimate interests would be harmed by more TLDs? None. The only losers are:
    1. Incumbents. And protecting their oligopoly is not a legitimate goal
    2. Trademark owners who already have attractive SLDs. But,
      1. Part of the balance struck in trademark law, is that mark owners have to bear the cost of policing. There's no legal or moral reason to bend the namespace out of shape for this interest, real as it is.
      2. Mark holders who don't have a domain name matching their mark gain by new TLDs. There are a lot of companies called "delta" out there, and they all have an equal claim to an SLD in that name.
      3. Non-mark holders wishing to make other legitimate uses of the character string also gain.
      4. Cybersquatting will be constrained by the existence of the UDRP, plus the fact that at some point (i'd think around the 25th or so), there's just no point in cybersquatting any more. Supply will begin to equilibrate with demand. Prices will drop, hoarding won't make sense, we'll all be better off.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Clear the queue
    by RFassett on Thursday April 25 2002, @06:43PM (#6006)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    this will never fly. Makes way too much sense and involves a sense of fairness to boot. Besides, we have to wait for the 5 year process where the NTEPPTF formally announces that 7 new TLD's were added to the root and the Internet did not break. Of course, this does assume that the .pro TLD is added within the next 5 years.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com