ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions ICANN Responds to Auerbach
    posted by michael on Thursday April 18 2002, @12:06PM

    ICANN responded today to at-large Director Karl Auerbach's lawsuit. The only surprise, if it is one, is just how mean ICANN's lawyers at Jones, Day are willing to be. Basically, ICANN has no shame at all (e.g. trying to make an issue out of how few votes were cast in Auerbach's election when it's ICANN that sabotaged the at-large vote).

    Stripped of all the folderol, at first glance there seem to be basically two legal strings to this bow: (1) Auerbach is a wild-eyed radical bent on destroying ICANN, and the corporation thus has a right to protect itself against him, and (2) the court should not hear the case because Auerbach failed to appeal the Audit Committee's decision to the full board. To anyone who knows the facts, the second defense is risible, since (as the very same response notes) the same Auerbach is in a tiny minority of the Board, and this would obviously be futile; of course Jones, Day can always hope that the court may not grasp that... The real action is the first claim. I am told that California lacks settled law on what a corporation might do if it could prove that a director was out to injure it; this case may provide it.



    Given that Karl shoots his mouth off from time to time, ICANN has found some juicy quotes to make a triable issue of it. Had it not been for the Lynn Report’s confessions of ICANN’s sins, ICANN might have run of it. And of course, one way that courts avoid hard questions when worried about them is to pick on some technicality to decide the case (thus the other complaints).

    Of course, if ICANN were anything more noble than a self-protection racket, it wouldn’t waste money on this, it would just open its books. Unless, of course, there’s something ghastly to hide?

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • waste money
  • responded
  • lawsuit
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN Responds to Auerbach | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN Responds to Auerbach
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday April 19 2002, @07:14AM (#5902)
    User #2810 Info
    Anon writes:
    ICANN has said all along that Auerbach can view the records if he abides by the policy.
    ICANN has said no such thing. There is no Board resolution to that effect. Even if there was, a Board resolution does not trump California law. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com