ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ICANN Staff and Structure DNSO? The gTLDs don't think so.
    posted by michael on Thursday April 18 2002, @11:42AM

    tlr writes "The following summary of some key points of today's Names Council telephone conference was produced by Alexander Svensson and myself. An MP3 recording of the telephone conference is available here. We'd recommend you listen, in particular, to the last 30 minutes of the call."



    To begin with, the council got stuck with agenda item 2 on the original agenda, Approval of Draft Conclusions to date. There were suggestions from the Business Constituency which had been circulated in advance, and there were numerous suggestions by Roger Cochetti on behalf of the gTLD registries constituency made during the call. Some of these suggestions consisted in entirely removing recommendations which had evolved during earlier calls. (Mr Cochetti joined the call only after a substantive portion of the BC edits had been discussed, and after another member of the council had called him, BTW.)

    To make a long story short, the single most important comment made by Mr Cochetti was in reference to the following recommendation (as amended by the business constituency):

    The DNSO and the other policy advisory bodies should remain essentially intact in function, and their effectiveness and process be improved.

    The comment: "The gTLD registries constituency doesn't think so."

    Mr Cochetti then explained that the gTLD constituency was rather thinking along the lines of the Lynn proposal, with small groups of likeminded stakeholders discussing policy.

    When asked how policy development should then be performed, Mr Cochetti was not able to comment on that at this point of time.

    J. Scott Evans of the Intellectual Property constituency gave some insights about the current IPC thinking about future policy development. One proposal seems to be to move it to the Board level and to create ad hoc and/or standing committees with members picked based on expertise, with staff and board liaisons. This model looks like a more traditional trade association (and the current Board committees already seem to replace DNSO policy-making in the way proposed by the IPC). Another approach discussed by the IPC is to "export" issues to other organizations: The Board decides to send an issue on to e.g. the IAB or other established specialized organizations.

    (From an Intellectual Property standpoint, this obviously makes sense, since ad hoc committee members on IPC-relevant topics might require familiarity with IP law as expertise -- or IPC-relevant issues could be exported to organizations such as WIPO.)

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • original agenda
  • circulated in advance
  • here
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    DNSO? The gTLDs don't think so. | Log in/Create an Account | Top | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com