ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • MŁller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ENUM & VOIP ENUM Delegation
    posted by michael on Friday March 29 2002, @05:09AM

    rfassett writes "The requests for ENUM delegation for specific country codes has picked up. A composite list of requests accepted by RIPE and forwarded on to the Telecommunications Standardization Bureau can be found here. If I understand the process correctly, these are each now each within the 60 day review window where anyone with objections can post publicly to enum-request@ripe.net for consideration

    The delegation requests have also brought some clarity to how this process works."




    It appears that first a government must notify the ITUís Telecommunications Standardization Bureau (TSB) of its desire to have its country code delegated within ENUM. Then, only an entity approved by this government will have its request forwarded by RIPE to the TSB without objection.

    If a government has not formally announced its desire to participate with ENUM (presumably to the TSB) then any request for delegation is promptly objected to by Richard Hill of the ITU and Counselor of the TSB. Further, if a government has agreed to delegation but the requester is not the entity authorized to do so by the government, then it appears this request will also be objected to by Richard Hill. This example surfaced when TLD Networks of the U.K requested delegation for 4.4.e164.arpa on February 23 and received the following objection February 26:

    "The ITU Telecommunications Standardization Bureau (TSB) objects to thisrequest because no approval for delegation of the code 44 has yet been received from the concerned country, the United Kingdom. According to information received by TSB, it does not appear that the requestor is the organization that might in the future receive approval for a delegation by the United Kingdom."

    But, on February 28 the U.K. Department of Industry and Trade submitted its request for delegation of 4.4.e164.arpa and on March 17 RIPE passed along the request to the TSB without any objection from Richard Hill. So, one must assume that the United Kingdom approved delegation for ENUM between February 26 and February 28 and that the TSB was already notified that the U.K. Department of Industry and Trade was the authorized entity to make such a request. Thus, no objections.

    The Institute of Computer Science for the Greek government requested 0.3.e164.arpa. Richard Hill objected to this on the basis the Greek government had not notified the TSB of its desire for ENUM delegation. The China Internet Network Information Center must have fallen into this same trap as its request for 6.8.e164.arpa was also objected. Each of these entities is a formal agency of their respective governments.

    This pretty much explains the process for ENUM delegation, sort of.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • requested
  • submitted
  • passed along
  • U.K. Department of Industry and Trade
  • Institute of Computer Science
  • requested
  • objected
  • China Internet Network Information Center
  • trap
  • here
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ENUM Delegation | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ENUM Delegation
    by RFassett on Friday March 29 2002, @08:26AM (#5636)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    it's hard to keep everybody straight. But it appears the TLD Networks noted above is the same TLD Networks recently shut down by a U.S. District Court at the request of the FTC. The FTC alleges that the companies violated federal law by failing to disclose on their Web sites that the domain names they were selling (.usa, .brit, etc) were not useable on the Internet, and by sending the deceptive spam.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ENUM Delegation
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday March 29 2002, @09:14AM (#5639)
    User #2810 Info
    Well, imagine that. enum.info actually points to a functional site carrying information about ENUM. This is an egregious misuse of the namespace. Following standard procedure it should have been sold to some speculator who would leave it unused. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com