ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ICANN Staff and Structure Touton on the never-implemented Independent Review process
    posted by jon on Thursday March 07 2002, @08:52AM

    ICANN just released a memo from Louis Touton on the Independent Review process. Nine months ago, the Board charged a nominating committee (Tim Berners-Lee, Scott Hemphill, Oliver Iteanu, Ching-Yi Liu, Joon Kook Park, Houlin Zhao) to come up with a list of nominees for ICANN's long-promised Independent Review Panel. And last month Scott Hemphill, on behalf of the committee, transmitted to ICANN a list of nine names for the Panel's nine initial vacancies: Zoe Baird (US), Diane Cabell (US), Scott Donahey (US), David Post (US), Michael Kirby (AU), Houston Putnam Lowry (US), Margit Brandl (AT), Henry Perritt (US), Zheng Chengsi (CN). So far so good, right? . . . Not so fast.



    The bad news, Louis Touton tells us, is that only Hemphill, Zhao, and Liu were involved in creating this list; the other three committee members declined to participate. The list thus was not the product of a committee majority; accordingly, the committee failed in its quorum requirement, and the list cannot be treated as a committee recommendation. Because ICANN's Independent Review Policy states that panel members are to be nominated by "the IRP Nominating Committee," and these haven't been, the Board can take no action without changing the policy.

    Under the circumstances, Touton suggests that ICANN junk the panel, and contract out the independent review function to commercial arbitration centers. He continues: "[I]t may be appropriate to require those seeking independent review under this mechanism to at least share in the costs paid to the arbitrators and the arbitration center."

    Looks like ICANN ducked a bullet. At least a couple of the names on the committee's list belong to folks who might actually have concluded, from time to time, that ICANN had violated its bylaws or acted in the absence of consensus. It would have been embarrassing for the Board to avoid that possibility by voting to reject the committee's nominations; this way is a lot easier.

    It's icing on the cake for the Board to eliminate the Independent Review Panel altogether. Under the commercial arbitration approach Touton suggests, a person filing for independent review would have to pay a substantial fee to invoke the process. (Let's look at the ICC International Court of Arbitration as a guide to fees for commercial arbitration. Their fees start at a $5000 floor, when the amount in dispute is negligible, and go up fast as a percentage of the amount at stake.) And what would such a person get for his thousards of dollars? The opportunity to argue to an arbitration panel that it should recommend to the Board that it think about maybe changing its mind on the matter in question. This is better than the Stuart Lynn argument that the entire concept of independent review is frivolous, but it still doesn't inspire confidence.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ICC International Court of Arbitration
  • a memo from Louis Touton
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Touton on the never-implemented Independent Review process | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 6 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Touton on the never-implemented Independent Re
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday March 07 2002, @11:56AM (#5181)
    User #2810 Info
    The IRP Nominating Committee members and who appointed them is available here. Following is a list of the members and their appointing organization. The first of each of the pairs of names was a two year appointment, the latter, three years:

    Tim Berners-Lee and Houlin Zhao, PSO
    Joon Kook Park and Ching-Yi Liu, ASO
    Olivier Iteanu and Scott Hemphill, DNSO

    It may be coincidence but it is the three year appointees who made some effort.

    Who are these people? Joon Kook Park is a lawyer. So are Iteanu and Liu, and they're also ALSC members. Iteanu is also a WIPO UDRP panelist. Houlin Zhao is the Director of the Telecommunication Standardization Bureau of the ITU. Scott Hemphill is President of registrar domainbank. If you don't know who Tim Berners-Lee is, you're on the wrong internet.

    It's a good thing that Lynn is going to banish the common volk from ICANN governance so that things get done. Er, wait a minute... -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Touton on the never-implemented Independent Re
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday March 07 2002, @07:13PM (#5185)
    User #2810 Info
    If you mean the IRP Nominating Committee, they are unpaid volunteer positions. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com