ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) .kids Bill Moves Forward
    posted by michael on Tuesday March 05 2002, @05:52AM

    According to Harold Feld of the Media Access Project, the Telecommunications and Internet Subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee of the House of Representatives has tentatively scheduled a mark-up of the ".kids" bill for March 6, although it appears likely that the final version will require a .kids.us rather than a new TLD. The bill is now styled, "H.R. 3833, the Dot Kids Implementation and Efficiency Act of 2002" and could raise issues regarding the .us contract with Neustar, which makes no provision for such a congressional command. [Also, Ellen Rony has a nice discussion of .kids issues at Declan McCullagh's Politech.]



    A subcommittee mark-up is a prelude to a bill being voted out to the full Committee, which must then report the Bill to the House for a vote. Then, of course, it must pass the Senate. Last fall, at a hearing on the bill, Subcommittee Chairman Upton stated that because of concerns raised on the international nature of TLDs, the Subcommittee was likely to rewrite the bill to require creation of .kids as an SLD under .us.

    Because DoC has contracted out the management of .us to Neustar, it is unclear whether Congress could pass such legislation without compensating Neustar for any loss it suffers due to alteration of the terms of the contract (i.e., it is unclear whether this kind of regulation constitutes a "takings" under the 5th Amendment).

    Speaking for myself, not Mr. Feld, it would seem that the cost issue would presumably be any monitoring required; creating .kids as an SLD and offering third level domains for sale can't really have any measurable marginal cost, can it?

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Harold Feld
  • Media Access Project
  • Telecommunications and Internet Subcommittee
  • a mark-up of the ".kids" bill
  • discussion
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .kids Bill Moves Forward | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: .kids Bill Moves Forward
    by davidson (adavidson@cdt.org) on Tuesday March 05 2002, @09:29AM (#5133)
    User #69 Info
    As noted, the .kids bill will be marked-up in a US House of Representative subcommittee on Wednesday. The markup is of a *new* bill HR 3833 - which includes two major changes from previous .kids legislation that was the subject of hearings this fall:

    * it calls for creation of .kids.us, not a new gTLD
    * it focuses on kids 12 and under, not 17 and under

    The changes do mitigate some of the problems with reaching a global consensus on .kids, with Congress putting mandates on ICANN, and with thorny issues about what material is appropriate for teens.

    However, concerns remain: How do you come up with a country-wide consensus on what should be in .kids? Will families in New York City and Salt Lake City agree on what is appropriate for kids under 13? How will you enforce such a standard? Are we giving parents false hope about creating a "safe" zone for kids that might not be so safe? And should Congress really be placing these mandates on a registry operator anyway?

    Case in point: The bill limits .kids.us to material "suitable for minors," defined as material that "is not psychologically or intellectually inappropriate for the age of the targeted audience.” Who is going to interpret that?

    CDT's letter from last fall on .kids is available online at:
    http://www.cdt.org/dns/011031dotkids.shtml

    A draft version of the new bill is now online at:
    http://www.cdt.org/dns/

    - Alan


    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .kids Bill Moves Forward
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday March 07 2002, @10:56AM (#5180)
    User #2810 Info
    The bill does require NeuStar to police *.kids.us. A registry policing content seems like a bad mix. So does legislators ordering such. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com