ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ICANN Staff and Structure Lynn to At-Large and Non-Commercial Interests in ICANN: Drop Dead
    posted by michael on Sunday February 24 2002, @01:21PM

    ICANN CEO Stuart Lynn today released the official version of the plan Joe Sims was peddling to the European Union last week. We'll post a more detailed commentary in a day or two, but in the mean time suffice it to say that the plan envisages having 5 of 15 Board members selected directly by governments (plus an ex officio GAC member) and the rest by registrars, registries, plus a few Board-squatter-like ringers chosen by the ICANN Board or staff.

    The main justifications offered for this shift are that in order to be "strong" ICANN needs more money, more support, and less "process". Of course, promises Lynn, ICANN's "core values of openness and broad participation" should be "preserved". (Don't laugh. It's not funny.) "Meaningful participation" will be achieved by cutting out any direct representation for end-users.

    ICANN was supposed to save the Internet from governments; since major interest groups such as the ccTLDs and RIRs won't do what ICANN wants, and won't pay it, ICANN now turns to governments to save it from the Internet.

    See the Press Release here, and then look at the entire brazen thing.
    [Updated with links to early news coverage.]



    One question which comes immediately to mind is to what extent the EU, the US, and other major players have bought into this takeover plan. There are a lot of others, too....

    One obstacle to drafting a properly thoughtful rely, alas, is that ICANN has so debased the language. Of course we want an "open and transparent" process. It's just that when ICANN comes promising openness, transparency, consultation, and other good things, one cannot help but read those promises in the shadow of how ICANN's staff has implemented those same promises and slogans for three years. There's a real 1984 situation here when it comes to nomenclature.

    PS. Lynn asserts, preemptively, that the folks who will oppose this plan are "those whose thinking is limited to self-interest in a narrow sense." Looks like we're in for a very civil debate here indeed.

    Update: Links to early news coverage.
    Reuters; Associated Press; Dow Jones;

    Fullest coverage in Reuters:

    `We've just had the equivalent of the president of the United States abolishing Congress,'' said Karl Auerbach, who represents North American Internet users. ....

    Lynn said he had not filled in the specifics of his proposal, such as how the government board seats would be filled, but that he would like decisions to be made quickly.

    ``This proposal is focusing on the what, not the how,'' Lynn said. ``What I have done is pointed out to the board that we don't have the luxury of time.''

    Auerbach and fellow board member Andy Muller-Maguhn, who represents European Internet users, said Lynn's proposal aroused little debate at the meeting.

    ``I would have expected each board member to have several questions about how it would work and so on, but that was not the case,'' Muller-Maguhn said.

    Rob Courtney, a policy analyst with the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology, said that ICANN was set up because governments were seen as too slow and out of touch with modern technology to administer the Internet.

    ``If you're going to have governments involved, what is the rationale for having ICANN?'' Courtney said.

    Click here to post your comments.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • GAC
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • Reuters
  • Associated Press
  • Dow Jones
  • here
  • was peddling to the European Union last week
  • Press Release
  • entire brazen thing
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Lynn to At-Large and Non-Commercial Interests in ICANN: Drop Dead | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • 7 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com