ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Budget and Expenditures Follow the money (or lack thereof)
    posted by tbyfield on Wednesday November 21 2001, @04:55PM

    CNN, summarizing an interview with ICANN CEO Stuart Lynn, says "the organization ... has no plans to go beyond" the seven new TLDs it approved last year. Granted, the summary loses some of the nuance of Lynn's own words; but still, the prospect raises a very interesting question...



    Prior to its discovery that charging $50,000 per TLD application was a lucrative business, ICANN spent quite a bit of time destabilizing DNS by groping after every source of cash they imagined came their way -- for example, ccTLDs. So if they put an end to the new TLD process, what other revenue streams do they have in the works?

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • lucrative business
  • ccTLDs
  • an interview
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Follow the money (or lack thereof) | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Follow the money (or lack thereof)
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Wednesday November 21 2001, @09:27PM (#3830)
    User #2810 Info
    The ComputerWorld article from which the CNN article derives is available here (the additional ICANN links in the right sidebar are also worth reading). The ComputerWorld Q and A includes such additional thoughts of Chairman Lynn as:
    Q: Do alternate DNS roots pose a security risk?

    A: Absolutely.

    Note well, the question was about security, not stability.

    As for revenue, with the CEO making clear there won't be any new TLDs any time soon, which yer resident net prophet telegraphed over a month ago (he said smugly), this will increase the value of ccTLDs. ICANN will continue its incremental steps to control them (see the November 21 ICANNBlog). Some national governments will also see their ccTLDs as a source of control, and/or revenue and come onside. ICANN has played the USG for fools to date, now they're taking it global. They must be at a point where they feel they have to go head to head with some of the recalcitrant ccTLD managers, and the .au agreement if used as a precedent could make for some serious headbanging. The artificial scarcity will also lead to other cashflows, witness the registrar auctions of expiring names for example, and no doubt some of this will find its way to ICANN. Those who don't like this New World Odor are free to announce they'd rather ally themselves with alt root security risks. In other words, if the ccTLDs ever again mention the nuclear option of taking their balls and going home it will be considered positively un-American and dealt with accordingly.

    And to answer the point raised elsewhere on this thread about the existence/whereabouts of a New TLD Committee, this interview done pre-MdR2k1 shows that Stuart already has that dialed in. They'll report in a couple of months (about a decision they haven't reached yet according to its Chair who has also just announced its decision already; if this doesn't make any sense, think ALSC or various working groups amongst many ICANN examples of prior apparently magical predictions that come true). That should be just in time for an ExCommittee meeting of the BoD to deal with it. Surely this must be open transparency's finest hour. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Moderator's note
    by Jon_Weinberg on Friday November 23 2001, @04:36AM (#3841)
    User #16 Info | www.threecats.net
    I have deleted a comment, per the policy in our FAQ that, on rare occasions, the editors may delete something "vile and repulsive." -- jon
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com