ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    USA Goverment Relations .US goes to Neustar
    posted by jon on Thursday November 01 2001, @04:41PM

    Back on Monday, the U.S. Commerce Department awarded the .US TLD to NeuStar. (Yes, I know it took me three days to write this up, but I've been looking through the contract paperwork trying to get the answers to some basic questions. And it isn't easy. I was a bit taken aback anyway, since I had confidently explained to a friend Monday morning that Neustar could never get this contract, given the large amount of entirely justified criticism it had received in connection with its rollout (in conjunction with Melbourne IT, its Neulevel partner) of .BIZ. Shows you what I know.) Anyway, here are a few of the high points of the .US award:



    Neustar as mini-ICANN

    You may remember that Neustar had declined to join the CDT-driven effort to put .US policy in the hands of a new ".us Policy Development Corporation," whose decisions would be binding on the registry. Rather, Neustar's documents now explain, Neustar will create a "usTLD Policy Council," whose recommendations it will accept if it feels like it. The relationship between Neustar as "usTLD Administrator" and the policy council is explicitly modeled on the relationship, as set out in the ICANN bylaws, between the ICANN Board and the DNSO. Neustar explains that this is a Good Thing, given "the significant progress that has been made within the ICANN in developing open and transparent consensus policy procedures" and the comfort that this familiar mechanism should give to DOC. Ya gotta wonder, though . . . It's become plain by now that the DNSO is essentially irrelevant to the ICANN policy process. Neustar appears to be telling us, before the .US policy council is even created, that its own council will suffer the same fate.

    (Neustar, by the way, will be appointing the first set of council members, "to facilitate its early start of operations," and explains that the council's first obligation will be to get elected members on board. Sound familiar?)

    Trademark lawyers want more

    Neustar is adopting both the UDRP and a sunrise provision, with a few changes -- because, it explains, the existing versions of these institutions aren't favorable enough to trademark holders. In connection with sunrise, Neustar's change is to make preferential rights available to people who don't have trademarks, but who have merely applied for one. That's right -- you don't need actually to have a trademark. You don't need to have any trademark rights. You just need to have filed a document with a government office asserting, rightly or wrongly, that you should get trademark rights in some string. Then, so long as the government hasn't gotten around to turning you down yet, you have a preference over the common herd in securing the associated SLD. Great.

    On the UDRP front, Neustar is trashing two hard-fought and extensively argued wording choices in ICANN's original UDRP on the ground that they're not favorable enough to trademark owners, and their drafters can't really have meant what they said. One was the statement that registering an SLD "to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name" is evidence of bad faith only if the domain-name holder has made a habit of that sort of thing. The reason for this language was that a trademark holder can allege that respondent registered a name to "prevent it from reflecting [its] mark" without any conduct by respondent other than registering the name -- not using it, not offering to sell it, not anything. Even WIPO and the UDRP drafters were unwilling to make respondents into such wide-open targets unless they were actual cybersquatters, who had registered a whole bunch of such names. Neustar has no such compunctions.

    The second was the requirement that for UDRP relief to be available, the name must have been both registered and used in bad faith. This choice was made in the original UDRP by Louis Touton, after extensive arguments on the point between trademark and public-interest representatives. For Neustar, either registration or use in bad faith is enough. That way, even if a domain name has never been used at all (and has never been offered for sale, which is commonly understood to qualify as "use"), a panelist can still read the registrant's mind and divine that it was "registered in bad faith," and should properly be transferred. Arbitrations were be handled by the American Arbitration Association, which, Neustar promises, will bring a fresh perspective to the process.

    Americans only

    Neustar is implementing a "US Nexus" requirement, under which a registrant must be a US citizen or resident, or a company incorporated in the US, or have a bona fide presence in the US. How will Neustar know? Simple, it answers -- it'll check the contact information that the registrant provides, to see if the addresses listed are in this country. That's it. Once a domain name is awarded, though, a third party can challenge the registrant's American bona fides; if the challenge succeeds, cancellation of the name (so that it can be registered by somebody else) is the only remedy available.

    Price

    Neustar's Ken Hansen has been quoted in at least one news article as saying that it will charge no fee for .US names. That's got to be mistaken (at least with respect to names in the non-locality name space); but what will the price be? I couldn't find it in any of Neustar's documents (although I did note that the "Funding for the usTLD" section now reads, in its entirety, "This page has been redacted"). Any eagle-eyed ICANNWatch readers who saw what I've missed? [Anonymous, below, points it out: The Registry-Registrar contract provides that Neustar will charge registrars a $5.50/year "wholesale" price for ordinary registrations. Thanks. -- jon]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • "Funding for the usTLD" section
  • awarded the .US TLD to NeuStar
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .US goes to Neustar | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 19 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: .US goes to Neustar
    by mbeatty on Friday November 02 2001, @03:46AM (#3350)
    User #3109 Info
    So if the only check for US nexus is an address, then a post office box will suffice and then it can be sold to anyone in the world after 60 days.

    I think a valid US taxpayer ID number (hidden from whois and checked against IRS database), and a PHYSICAL US address (verifiable through postal service database) should be required and the commerce department should arrange the database accesses.

    An ongoing check could be done in that a postcard with a pin number is sent to the address annually to insure the address is real and correct. If the pin number is not entered by a specified deadline, cancellation notice is sent.

    This is not a global domain and needs strong protection to remain a US asset.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 8 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com