ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    USA Goverment Relations HR 2417 to be Amended to Require .kids UNDER .us
    posted by michael on Thursday November 01 2001, @04:53AM

    Listening to the start of the live broadcast of the hearing before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Interneton regarding the .kids bill, HR 2417, I heard Rep. Shimkus - the bill sponsor - say that he was amending the bill to remove the requirement that .kids be a TLD, and instead would make it a second-level domain under .us.

    This concession would remove one major source of opposition to the bill. It would take the issue out of the international arena, and would raise some interesting domestic US questions. Note, however, that the very next speaker, objected to the change...and that Nancy Victory's testimony stated that Neustar, the new contractor for .us, is committed to creating a .kids.us which she says "may obviate the need for such legislation". Nancy Victory is the head of the NTIA which is the body that "supervises" ICANN and signs contracts with it. She also objected to the idea of Congress telling ICANN what to do arguing that would contradict the Department of Commerce's plan to 'privatize' ICANN, would annoy foreign governments, and would involve DoC telling ICANN what to do -- something she said DoC doesn't do since the MoU with ICANN is all about 'cooperation'. Updated.



    The un-amended text of the bill is visible in .pdf from the GPO. [UPDATE: The text of the "manager's amendment" (a new version of the bill) can now be found here.]

    Surely no one could object to a national government passing a law regulating the use of its ccTLD, so long as it did so consistent with domestic law. There are, however, a number of tough US law questions about how the government would define and mandate a list of what is 'kid-friendly'. Nancy Victory also threatened that changing Neustar's "expectations" about its obligations under the contract let last friday to make it the manager for .us might threaten the entire procurement. [Not that this should bother anyone too much, I'd say.]

    New.net testified in support of the idea of .kids under .us, but argued that there should be open competition on who gets to run it, and that its .kids[.new.net] registrants should have first dibs on the right to register the corresponding .kids.us name.

    Please feel free to add summaries of the later testimony in the comments to this item.

    Prepared testimony will be visible from the committee's hearing page.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • from the GPO
  • here
  • comments
  • hearing page
  • live broadcast
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    HR 2417 to be Amended to Require .kids UNDER .us | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 34 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: HR 2417 to be Amended to Require .kids UNDER .
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday November 01 2001, @04:50PM (#3336)
    User #2810 Info
    Wired has some coverage of this story. I said all along that putting kids under ccTLDs made more sense. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: New.Net
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Thursday November 01 2001, @06:42PM (#3342)
    User #2810 Info
    Anon writes:
    Parents control the options, is ICANN going to protect the .kids of the world or new.net, thats a joke.
    ICANN seems concerned it can't easily confirm who At Large members are, so how does kidshtml.com confirm that you're a parent? And how is this policed so that links aren't hijacked as I pointed out recently here. This is just more bindzero spam. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • Re: kidshtml by fnord Saturday November 03 2001, @05:47PM
      • Re: kidshtml by fnord Tuesday November 06 2001, @04:34AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com