Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    USA Goverment Relations Decision coming on .US
    posted by jon on Friday October 19 2001, @06:01AM

    Newsbytes quotes an unnamed "Commerce Department official" as saying that the Department plans to name the new operator of .US later this month. This will avoid any need to extend the existing Verisign contract, which expires on November 10.

    For those of you who have forgotten the story, DOC's request of bids this summer this summer raised a number of eyebrows, and was criticized as a "giveaway" of the .US name space. It indicated that the new registry would sell users SLDs directly under .US (in addition to maintaining the old locality-based space), and it mandated a UDRP, enhanced whois, and a sunrise procedure for trademark owners' benefit. Notwithstanding that all registrants will have to pass a "United States Nexus Requirement," it required the registry to follow all "ICANN policies pertaining to open ccTLDs."

    (As I noted at the time, that's just weird. It's odd enough that a registry that's limited to folks with a "United States nexis" should have to follow rules designed for TLDs that anybody in the world can register in. Beyond that, though, there aren't any ICANN policies pertaining to open ccTLDs -- not yet, anyway. The folks at ICANN would like to promulgate some sort of policies for open ccTLDs; those policies, presumably, will be binding on ccTLDs only to the extent that a given ccTLD adopts them voluntarily. Yet the Department of Commerce staked its place, first in line, to agree to be bound by a set of ICANN policies that haven't even been promulgated yet, without regard to what they say, and without regard to the fact that they're directed at a different set of registries entirely.)

    Key House members, Senators, another key House member, public interest groups, and academics criticized the process and asked for delay and rethinking; the Commerce Department refused.

    While contenders were preparing their bids for the potentially-lucrative registry, a coalition led by the Center for Democracy and Technology sought to work with them to get them to endorse a plan under which actual policy control of the registry would be shifted to a nonprofit ".us Policy Development Corporation" to be formed by the coalition. The nonprofit's governing structure, the coalition explained, would reflect a balance among legacy users (local governments, schools and libraries); nonprofit public interest groups; business and individual users; and technical operators (registrars and ISPs). Some of the applicants (Register.com, Tucows, and eNic) signed with CDT; others (including Sarnoff, Neustar, Verisign and US-Register.com) didn't.

    DOC decision coming this month; stay tuned.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • Key House members
  • Senators, another key House member
  • public interest groups
  • academics
  • Newsbytes quotes
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Decision coming on .US | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 6 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Decision coming on .US
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday October 19 2001, @10:39AM (#3025)
    User #2810 Info
    Competition is dead? That's a theological question. Can something that was never born be said to be dead? -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com