Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) It's Not Just Trademarks . . .
    posted by DavidP on Friday September 28 2001, @05:14AM

    UDRP aficionados might be interested in the decision in the Cheaper.com arbitration. In theory, according to its terms, the UDRP is about (and only about) trademark conficts; the complainant in a UDRP proceeding has to show not just that he/she has a "better claim" to a domain name than the registrant, but rather that the challenged domain name is "identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights." No trademark or service mark, no claim. See UDRP Paragraph 4(a).

    Would that life were so simple ...

    In the case at hand, the complainant (IDT Corp.) registered "Cheaper.com" with NSI. There was a screw-up; when another party registered Cheaper.com through a different registrar (Alldomains.com), the name was, according to the arbitrator, "erroneously released by NSI." IDT went to the UDRP to try to get the domain back; and the arbitrator awarded it to them.

    It's pretty unspectacular stuff; if NSI really just made a mistake, I guess I'm not going to get too worked up about correcting that mistake.

    But here's what the arbitrator said about "confusing similarity," in its entirety:

    "Complainant alleges that the domain name CHEAPER.COM is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark, which applies to goods, services, communication services, telecommunication, long distance and call back service, Internet provider services, as well as telephone calling card services. I therefore conclude that the registered domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant's protected mark."

    It's a little peculiar; because Complainant alleges confusing similarity, the arbitrator "therefore concludes" that there is confusing similarity. No proof of the existence of a trademark in the first place is even offered. Weird.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • decision in the Cheaper.com arbitration
  • UDRP Paragraph 4(a)
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    It's Not Just Trademarks . . . | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 5 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: It's Not Just Trademarks . . .
    by Anonymous on Friday September 28 2001, @05:30AM (#2620)
    You are much too kind, or too subtle. This is part of a pattern. Errors of this nature never happen in favor of respondents.
    Re: It's Not Just Trademarks . . .
    by Grumpy on Friday September 28 2001, @05:53AM (#2621)
    User #2759 Info
    Actually, take another look at paragraph #1 of the "findings" in the opinion. It notes that the cheaper.com DN registration and "trademark rights" were transferred to IDT in January 2001. Since exhibits are not attached to UDRP opinions, we're left to presume that the exhibit is a legitimate assignment of the CHEAPER or CHEAPER.COM common law mark, along with its goodwill. If the assignment of DN registration and trademark rights from Berdo to IDT is valid, then we may have no more than a less-than-complete opinion.

    Admittedly, I'd prefer to see IDT's proof of distinctiveness and/or secondary meaning for the mark in the opinion. IDT filed a U.S. trademark application for CHEAPER.COM back in July 2001 for its telecom and pre-paid calling card services, No. 78/072,596... so there's at least some indication that IDT may have alleged common law TM rights in its UDRP complaint or response.

    I'd also prefer to know what Respondents said about the validity of IDT's trademark rights in their response, and how the panelist resolved any inconsistencies. But this particular opinion does not yet deserve a place among the true howlers of UDRP history.

    - Grumpy
    Re: It's Not Just Trademarks . . .
    by plj on Friday September 28 2001, @08:06AM (#2625)
    User #2756 Info
    I posted this decision as my Case of Week during the week of Sept. 3. This one was probably better left to the courts. Take a look at http://www.udrplaw.net/casesoftheweek.htm if you are interested.

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com