Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    ICANN Staff and Structure ICANN's call for Public Participation
    posted by DavidP on Friday September 07 2001, @05:43AM

    ICANN has recently posted a call for increased public participation in ICANN's activities ["Participate in ICANN"]. It's an interesting, and a revealing, document.

    On the one hand, surely there's nothing wrong - indeed its probably laudable - to call for greater public participation and involvement in ICANN's affairs, and ICANN's efforts in that direction should surely be encouraged.

    The paper itself has a more-than-decent summary of ICANN's organizational structure - not a bad starting point, actually, for people coming into this debate who know little or nothing about what all the hubbub is about, what ICANN is and what it does, what these "supporting organizations" are, and the like. There's even an ICANN org chart - designed, I suspect, to counter the rather unpleasant connotations associated with the now-classic Tony Rutkowski version of ICANN's internal structure.

    Of course, the rationale for greater public participation and involvement in ICANN's affairs, ultimately, is that greater public participation and involvement in ICANN's affairs will make some sort of a difference in the way ICANN operates. "ICANN's policy development process depends heavily on the voluntary participation of individuals and organizations from the communities it serves," the paper suggests, and the "best argument for getting involved in the ICANN process" is that

    ". . . it matters to the future of the Internet. The domain name and IP address systems on which most Internet traffic now depends have been remarkable technological success stories: the standards are open and non-proprietary, and they have proven capable of supporting the massive exponential growth of the Internet since the mid-1980s. . . . The ICANN structure is one in which an active, interested participant can make a real difference. . . . By getting involved in the ICANN process, you can help determine the future of the Internet's systems of unique identifiers."

    Perhaps. Many of us, of course, believe just the opposite - that ICANN's decision are actually made by a handful of individuals, insulated from public view, and that the organizational complexity is just a kind of smokescreen that obscures this central fact.

    And while we're on the subject, one other thing in this paper caught my roving eye (or actually the eye of my co-editor, Michael Froomkin, who passed it along to me with the electronic equivalent of the raised eyebrow): the paper describes ICANN's purpose in these words:

    "ICANN is responsible for coordinating the Internet's three key systems of unique identifiers. Given that hundreds of millions of Internet users every day depend on the Domain Name and IP Address systems to route their communications, ICANN works to ensure that those systems operate and evolve to serve the global Internet community in a stable and reliable manner."

    I've said it before - ad nauseum - and I'll say it again: all of the "action" here is in those words "evolve" and "stable." There is an element of instability in evolution that cannot be wished away, and the more ICANN thinks its job is to ensure Internet "stability" the less robust that "evolution" will be. Guaranteed.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • GAC
  • ICANN org chart
  • Tony Rutkowski version
  • "Participate in ICANN"
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN's call for Public Participation | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN's call for Public Participation
    by Anonymous on Friday September 07 2001, @07:15AM (#2266)
    Actually, what I find breathtakingly hypocritical about this document is that ICANN had a membership of people who jumped all its hurdles to actually vote -- and then it put it on ice and ignored them. If you want to update your contact details at ICANN's member site, how do you do it? You can't. And the member forums are closed. All because ICANN was too afraid of the legal consequences of appearing to have members.

    It's a bit rich to call for public participation after more than a year of trying very hard to make no outreach or maintenance to the self-identified interested parties in the hopes they would just go away. (And, it seems, they did, mostly.)

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com