Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) WIPO Final Report on Second Domain Name Process
    posted by jon on Monday September 03 2001, @05:39AM

    dtobias writes "The World Intellectual Property Organization has released the final version of its report stemming from its second process regarding domain name policies. (The first process resulted in the UDRP now in effect.) The new report can be found here.

    In the new report, WIPO recommends that all domain names that are identical to generic drug names on the International Nonproprietary Names list be cancelled upon complaint by any party and review that the name does indeed match the INN, without regard to whether such domain use is in good or bad faith. And it recommends the establishment of a dispute procedure regarding the names of international intergovernmental organizations, parallel to the UDRP, but applying to all cases "likely to create a misleading association" (no specific requirement of bad faith), and not subject to judicial review due to the immunities of intergovernmental organizations."

    However, WIPO declines at this point to request the imposition of new rules regarding personal names, geographical names, or trade names, given the lack of international agreement on these things, though it suggests the possibility of starting a process to enact new laws or treaties in those regards.

    Public comments were solicited earlier this year and posted in the WIPO site. I submitted my own comments to them, some of which were cited in the footnotes of the final report.

    The proposed policies with regard to pharmaceutical names and intergovernmental organizations have the potential to result in unjust actions which WIPO wishes to make unreviewable in any outside court -- clearly, many sites engaging in free speech that is constitutionally protected at least in some countries might get suppressed under these policies, which don't even require a showing of bad faith as required by the UDRP.

    The report also shows an extreme shortage of evidence of any actual harm caused by registrations which would be barred by these new rules -- not a single case was cited where a domain name matching a nonproprietary drug name actually caused documented consumer confusion. I see no legal or moral reason why the generic names of drugs deserve any more special protection than, say, the generic names of flowers or any other object or substance.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • Public comments
  • my own comments
  • World Intellectual Property Organization
  • here
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    WIPO Final Report on Second Domain Name Process | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: WIPO Final Report on Second Domain Name Proces
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Monday September 03 2001, @06:41AM (#2137)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    For more arguments on why wipo's proposals go too far, see my comments to WIPO.

    I think there are two additional points to make about this final report. First, although it's much tamer than the draft (just as the first round pulled back from the even more ambitious draft that preceded it), the precedents that WIPO proposes setting are quite radical.

    I think, however, that the chances of ICANN adopting these proposals is very low for two reasons. First, the UDRP is clearly very broken, and the fight will be about how much to roll it back, not whether to expand it. The smart trademark people understand this, and have been very moderate in their demands for UDRP expansion, saving their political capital to hold what they already have. Second, to the extent that the WIPO proposals would require ICANN to cause the cancellation of existing registrations such as caffeine.com, this would represent an act of acquisition that would be a prohibited government "takings" if conducted by a federal agency. The loser of the domain name would have a case against ICANN in which s/he could argue a right to due process with a very sympathetic set of facts. ICANN isn't going to take that risk.

    Having said that, once again I commend WIPO for the clarity of its writing, and for considerable honesty. WIPO admitted that there wasn't much evidence of harm to back up its claims for action. And at key points it admits that many of its suggestions would involve making new international law, and that the way to do this is through traditional processes, not ICANN.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com