ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    New gTLDs .info Sunrise Period Resumed for 24 Hour
    posted by michael on Thursday August 30 2001, @04:19AM

    dtobias writes "We all thought the problem-ridden sunrise period for .info was finally over, but according to some messages on the ICANN forum, it has actually come back from the dead for a 24 hour period, running from 10:00 UTC (7 AM EDT) today through the same time tomorrow. This was done by Afilias because of alleged glitches in the final hours of the sunrise period that prevented some last-minute registrations from being processed. (There was some question on the message boards as to just what time the sunrise period was supposed to end anyway -- since the WHOIS timestamps were in UTC, many assumed that the period ended at midnight UTC, 8 PM EDT, but in fact some registrations, like norfolk.info, were processed after that.)"



    Supposedly, the extra 24 hour period (announced to the registrars but not posted on the nic.info site) is open only to registrants who attempted to register in a timely manner but failed due to the glitch. This restriction will presumably be enforced with the same degree of diligence that the trademark status of sunrise registrants has been enforced so far.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • messages on the ICANN forum
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .info Sunrise Period Resumed for 24 Hour | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 7 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Correction...
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday August 31 2001, @01:50AM (#2078)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    I got the times wrong in my original article... 10:00 UTC is actually 6 AM EDT. Anyway, this "extended" sunrise period is now over, and hopefully that means the sunrise period is over for good now...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .info Sunrise Period Resumed for 24 Hour
    by challenge on Thursday August 30 2001, @08:08AM (#2068)
    User #3020 Info
    I have rarely seen such incompetence at this level of responsibility.

    -Afilias lied about the extent of the fraud.
    -They purposely ignored 2 viable solutions.
    -They insist on not coming-clean with the public.
    -They are causing a great deal of confusion and providing very little guidance.
    -They had 4 weeks to try and improve their disastrous image.
    -Even though the whole show is being run by a marketing-type!
    -They simply don't care.
    -There appears to be no accountability whatsoever.

    Given their track record so far, what comes next will most likely be an even bigger FIASCO..

    A great deal of speculation was offered as to why "Afilias" is doing what it's doing, the way it's doing it. Bottom line it is nothing short of absolute and utter INCOMPETENCE.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: .info Sunrise Period Resumed for 24 Hour
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday August 31 2001, @12:42AM (#2076)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    "Proof of concept", in the context of the new TLDs, simply means that they are being introduced so that the problems and benefits of adding new TLDs can be monitored for the purpose of deciding if and how future TLDs might be introduced. It doesn't mean that the present batch of new TLDs are not "real", as you seem to be implying. .info exists in the official root of the Internet just as much as .com does, and is very unlikely to be removed from the root just because its sunrise period was botched so badly.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com