ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) More on .US
    posted by jon on Tuesday July 31 2001, @04:11PM

    According to a story by Dugie Standeford in today's Washington Internet Daily, the applicants for the .US contract included Telcordia (Verisign's partner in ENUM, with Verisign providing technical services) and eNIC (the registry for .cc, with Verisign again providing technical services). In addition, a group of nonprofits including the League of Women Voters has sought an extension of time to file an application, in which Verisign would provide. . . you got it.

    Correction posted inside . . .



    Neustar was another applicant. eNIC, the article continues, has signed the CDT coalition's memorandum of understanding, and CDT has identified Register.com and Tucows as other signers. On the other hand, the Washington Internet Daily article quotes Tucows's Ross Rader as denying that Tucows filed a proposal. Go figure.

    (Washington Internet News articles aren't normally linkable, but Warren Communications News, 800-771-9202, www.warren-news.com, has granted us permission to post and link to this one issue.)

    Speaking of the CDT coalition, a second look at the CDT Memorandum of Understanding (inspired by Anonymous's comments yesterday) does raise some additional issues. Is the coalition's organizational work really worth $450,000? How much of that sum will go to the coalition's legal counsel -- Jones, Day, Reavis and Pogue? (Yes, that Jones, Day, Reavis and Pogue.) [Correction: Joe Sims has written me to explain that while he did some personal pro bono work in drafting some of the coalition documents, at the request of Mike Roberts, neither he nor Jones, Day is counsel for the coalition, and neither he nor Jones, Day is receiving any money from the relationship. -- jon]

    And is it a little disturbing that, under the Memorandum of Understanding, a nonprofit to be created by the coalition will control policy for the .US domain (with the registry required to give it advance notice of all "proposed actions that have or could have policy implications"), but the memorandum doesn't actually say very much about what this new nonprofit would look like, or how it would be run? After all, the last time we saw the formation of a new nonprofit to set Internet governance policy, we got . . . ICANN.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • story
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    More on .US | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 10 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: More on .US
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Wednesday August 01 2001, @05:12PM (#1567)
    User #2810 Info
    Is the Correction from that Joe Sims who did pro bono work for Jon Postel? And how much has JDRP since billed ICANN for (that's not entirely rhetorical, does anyone have the figure)? Regardless, sure looks like deja vu all over again. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: More on .US
    by Buckshot6 on Thursday August 02 2001, @02:36PM (#1574)
    User #2948 Info
    As an unknown bidder of the .us doamin. We were not asked to agree to anything outside of the bid RFQ. In our bid, we did include a provsion for reasonable agreements. We have set up a US domain Trust and Foundation.

    We have provided a Performance Bond of USD$5,000.000.00 (USD$5MM) CASH !

    We welcome the idea to enter into agreements with outside enities who share our open vievpoints.





    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: More on .US
    by Jon_Weinberg on Wednesday August 01 2001, @05:34AM (#1554)
    User #16 Info | www.threecats.net
    It's the fourth word ("story") of the ICANNWatch item. For your convenience, though, here's another link. -- jon
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com