ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Gaming the UDRP Task Force?
    posted by jon on Friday July 06 2001, @04:55PM

    The Names Council, at its July 29 meeting, approved a new task force to recommend changes in the UDRP. As presented to the Names Council, the draft terms of reference proposed a pretty inclusive-looking committee, including representatives from each of twenty identified groups. As approved by the Names Council, though, the final terms of reference incorporated one itty-bitty change: They now directed that the Task Force may not include any of the five people named, in September 1999, to advise Louis Touton in his drafting of the original UDRP documents (implementing policies the ICANN Board had adopted a month earlier, in its Santiago meeting).

    The five people now barred from the new task force: Michael Froomkin (law professor, member of the WIPO Panel of Experts on the UDRP and, well, ICANNWatch editor), Kathy Kleiman (representing the NCDNHC and the Domain Name Rights Coalition), Steven Metalitz (representing the International Intellectual Property Alliance), Rita Rodin (representing AOL and the registrars), and Scott Evans (representing the International Trademark Association).

    For the story of how this happened, and the reasons why it is at best a Really Bad Idea, read on . . .



    The story of how it happened is simple: At I hr 32 minutes into the Names Council meeting, Caroline Chicoine proposed an amendment to the draft terms of reference excluding all of the September 1999 committee members, explaining that the proposal came from the Intellectual Property Constituency. When Milton Mueller asked who the committee members had been, nobody seemed to know -- folks managed to come up with the names of Evans, Rodin and Kleiman, but blanked on the others. That was the only discussion surrounding the amendment; it was incorporated into the document with essentially no discussion of whether it was a good idea.

    In fact, it's a very odd idea. The terms of reference refer to these five people as the "drafting committee constituted by ICANN to draft the UDRP," and I suppose the notion might be that, as the original drafters of the UDRP, these five would have insufficient perspective to evaluate it. There's only one problem: It's not so. The Board's Santiago resolutions directed Touton to start with a policy document and rules of procedure that had already been prepared by a registrars' group, and to amend it in three specific ways. Touton made it clear that he would entertain no suggestions as to the content of the UDRP that did not fall within that narrow brief. Further, the committee members were to "advise" him, but were not to haggle over language or to do any actual drafting. As Touton's later report emphasized, "the responsibility for selecting the language in the posted documents was that of ICANN staff and counsel, not the committee members." And none of the members came away with all they asked for.

    So what have we got, then? Apparently, we're taking five people who were deemed to have the greatest level of subject-matter and legal drafting expertise, so that they were invited to kibitz when Touton drafted the UDRP implementation documents, and singling them out as the only people who cannot serve on a task force intended to recommend changes in how the UDRP operates. Seems backwards. Worse than backwards, in fact. After all, the trademark bar has a whole lot of competent lawyers who can represent the interests of trademark owners on this task force; the IPC doesn't particularly need Evans or Metalitz to serve. But the ranks of trademark experts within the public-interest community are much thinner. Froomkin, who was the sole public representative on the WIPO panel of experts on this topic, has been the leading voice within the public-interest community on UDRP policy issues; Kleiman's contribution too has been invaluable. Without them, the ability of the public-interest community to participate on the task force is significantly weakened.

    And one can't help noticing that the source of this proposal was the Intellectual Property Constituency. I don't blame Chicoine for this; apparently she didn't draft the language, and was unaware of its full impact. But it seems fair to assume that whoever in the IPC did draft this language knew who it would exclude. And that person wasn't doing so to exclude Metalitz and Evans; one can only assume the point was to exclude Kleiman and Froomkin.

    I confess to my own interest here: I've known Michael Froomkin for a long time, and -- like him -- I'm an editor of ICANNWatch. But that doesn't stop me from pointing out a Really Bad Idea when I see one.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Names Council meeting
  • report
  • July 29 meeting
  • draft terms of reference
  • final terms of reference
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Gaming the UDRP Task Force? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 12 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com