ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    USA Goverment Relations Congress May Require ICANN to Create .kids
    posted by michael on Friday June 29 2001, @05:41PM

    Newsbytes reports that two members of the US Congress today introduced a bipartisan bill to require ICANN to create .kids. The bill would prohibit the Department of Commerce from adding any other ICANN-selected domains to the root until .kids was created. Newsbytes quotes an aide to one of the bill's sponsors as saying that the ICANN domain-selection process has "been so unresponsive to the general public interest that this is where it inevitably goes."

    Members of Congress often introduce bills that have no hope of passage just to score political points, but this is the sort of seemingly costless idea (involving no direct expenditure and almost no political cost either) that sometimes becomes impossible for anyone in office to oppose. It's striking that the bill is being introduced by Rep. John Shimkus, a very conservative Republican, and Rep. Edward Markey, a very liberal Democrat. So, who knows, it might pass. But, then there are the constitutional questions...



    Ordinarily the First Amendment to the US Constitution makes it impossible for the US government to create any type of censorship regime, but the rules are somewhat different if it can show that it protects children, or empowers parents or schoolteachers to do so, and that there are plentiful alternate channels for uncensored speech. So here too, depending on how the bill is drafted it might pass muster.

    Almost any attempt at government-sponsored speech regulation is litigated in the US, often with the help of groups such as the ACLU. Since the bill calls for ICANN to pick the .kids operator, it is possible that such a case would provide an occasion to determine the extent to which ICANN is legally a "US government actor" -- a critical and unsettled legal issue at present.

    The bill is HR 2417, but it is not online yet at Thomas, the Library of Congress's web site. Just a message saying "Bills are generally sent to the Library of Congress from the Government Printing Office a day or two after they are introduced on the floor of the House or Senate. Delays can occur when there are a large number of bills to prepare or when a very large bill has to be printed."

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ACLU
  • Thomas
  • reports
  • Rep. John Shimkus
  • Rep. Edward Markey
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Congress May Require ICANN to Create .kids | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 21 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Congress May Require ICANN to Create .kids
    by hofjes on Saturday June 30 2001, @01:18PM (#1026)
    User #60 Info
    Does the bill require that all content propagated via a .kids domain be kid-safe?

    Does the bill provide for enforcement of kid-safe content?

    What penalties are provided for making available content that is not kid-safe?

    What is kid-safe anyway?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Congress May Require ICANN to Create .kids
    by hofjes on Sunday July 01 2001, @06:12AM (#1030)
    User #60 Info
    Because their constituents are very fond of protecting kids from the dangers of the Internet.

    Very few people understand the DNS and content control. By passing this bill, congress-people can say they did something "big" to protect kids, and 99% of people will believe them.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 8 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com