Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Verisign/NSI VeriSign Pulls Plug on Domain-Policy List
    posted by michael on Thursday May 24 2001, @05:26AM

    Without warning, VeriSign today pulled the plug on the venerable Domain-Policy list. The archives seem to have vanished too. The final message to the list from Tom Newell, announcing immediate stoppage, is reprinted inside.

    The move comes as VeriSign is newly secure in its monopoly in .com. And, in the past few days the firm was stung by a series of posts regarding a lawsuit by a former employee. While it's true that there are other places to discuss domain name issues (here for example!), pulling the plug in this way removes archives from the reach of Internet historians. The lack of advance notice also makes it hard for anyone else to volunteer to take over the list at a new host. VeriSign certainly has no obligation to host a mailing list for its critics, although one would have hoped they were big enough to take it with less petulance. But the decent thing to do would be to leave up the archives, and to make the subscriber list available to a suitable volunteer host if one materializes.

    Here is the text of the last message on the Domain-Policy list:

    Date: Tue, 24 May 0101 11:13:49 -0400
    From: Tom Newell {tomn@LISTS.NETSOL.COM}
    Subject: List deactivation

    This list will be closed effective immediately. When we started the list many years ago, there were no lists specifically focusing on domain policy issues. Today there are a wide range of public lists that address this topic.

    Thank you very much for your participation.

    Please refer all queries to Brian O'Shaughnessy, of VeriSign's Corporate Communications department at boshaughnessy@verisign.com.


    [To respond, or start a new comment thread, click the "Send Your Comment" button in the yellow box to the upper right.]

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • boshaughnessy@verisign.com
  • archives
  • a lawsuit by a former employee
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    VeriSign Pulls Plug on Domain-Policy List | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 17 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Very Disappointing, Poorly Handled
    by lextext on Thursday May 24 2001, @06:24AM (#641)
    User #6 Info | http://www.lextext.com

    Personally, I find this very disappointing. The Domain-Policy list has always been noisy, but it's also been a great place to get information on the arcane issues of domain name administration. This is an area that's becoming increasingly complex with the addition of new registrars and new TLDs. I've always viewed it as a credit to NSI, Verisign and all of its employees that it both sponsored the list and actively participated in it. Years before the Cluetrain left the station, NSI was already on board, actively engaging its customers in an online dialogue with knowledgeable, senior managers, not clueless customer service reps. In spite of new competition in the domain name registration market, I've kept my domain name registrations with NSI for one reason: because I knew I could turn to the NSI employees I had met on the Domain-Policy list if something went wrong.

    By abandoning the list, Verisign is making room for one of its competitors to now sponsor a similar list. I doubt much time at all will pass before someone still on board the train siezes the opportunity. And I'll become acquainted with a new set of experts.

    It's also hard not to view the crude way in which the list was terminated (no notice, no opportunity for list members to organize a new list or download the archives) against the U.S. Department of Commerce's approval last week to give Verisign near-perpetual control of the .com registry. Now secure in its position as the dominant registry and dominant registrar, Verisign takes years of important archives off-line and abruptly ends an ongoing dialogue with some of its best customers. Let's hope this is not a sign of what is to come.

    -- Bret
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    AP coverage
    by alexander on Thursday May 24 2001, @11:13AM (#644)
    User #22 Info | http://www.icannchannel.de
    VeriSign Ends Critical Discussion
    Associated Press 1:05 p.m. May 24, 2001 PDT

    Brian O'Shaughnessy, a VeriSign spokesman, said the closure
    had nothing to do with the criticisms. If that had been the
    case, he said, VeriSign would have shut down the list long ago.


    ICANNwatch is mentioned, too.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Moderation and Rubbish Posts
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Friday May 25 2001, @04:06AM (#658)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    It's PHP-Nuke (and version 4.2 at that) not Slashcode, alas, and so far we have turned off moderation. As a result, all signed posts go in at "1" and all anonymous ones go in at "0". User moderation is not well implemented in this version of PHP-Nuke (in fact, it's near useless). There is a decent editor-only moderation function, but we don't intend to use that unless we have to.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: VeriSign Pulls Plug on Domain-Policy List
    by sergio on Sunday May 27 2001, @04:15AM (#674)
    User #27 Info
    Good point this one. Anyway the clue of the "story" is : massive use of power, by NSI obviously. The way the list has been closed is such a clear point: we have the power, "shut up" . And all of this is coming just the same week the modified agreement was signed. Would NSI have done the same thang if it was just few days ago before the approval by DOC? I don't have a clue, they have. Anyway, critics apart, the whole point is to get back the archive and understand exactly why NSI had such an use of power, (this reminds better the word abuse).
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: VeriSign Pulls Plug on Domain-Policy List
    by pappas on Tuesday May 29 2001, @10:06AM (#680)
    User #2871 Info
    These are the ONLY people who posted to the list on May 23 and May 24:

    Tom Newell

    !Dr. Joe Baptista

    Jeff Williams

    Karl Peters

    John Berryhill PhD

    Bruce James

    flip levin

    Dan Steinberg

    Jay R. Ashworth

    David Howe

    Roeland Meyer

    Richard J. Sexton

    Admin (Russ Smith)

    There is no "Danny" who posted to the list on the day it was closed or any time on the previous day.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com