ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    .eu and Europe too .ie Seeks to Organize Irish Bid to Run .eu
    posted by michael on Sunday April 22 2001, @04:32PM

    While murk continues to cover the question of exactly how or when .eu might be created, not to mention by whom and on what authority, interest in running what might well be the second-largest registry after .com continues to grow. The Irish Times reports this week that .ie is seeking to put together a consortium to bid for the job. But the French, it says, want the registry in France. The article also has some interesting nuggets about the general progress of the .eu proposal.



    According to the Irish Times,
    "The European Parliament and the Council of Ministers are due to consider and vote on a concrete proposal for an .eu domain registry within the next two months. If approved, the European Commission will invite tenders to operate the central registry."

    ...

    "However, if any objections are raised or amendments requested by political parties when the proposal is debated in the European Parliament next month, this could delay approval by up to 18 months.

    "There is also the issue of approval from ICANN, the international body which oversees Internet domain names. So far, it has refused to issue a .eu TLD on the grounds that the EU is not a specific country and therefore cannot register .eu as a country code TLD.

    Personally, I'm all for a .eu domain, although I don't think it complies with the RFCs since .eu isn't a true country code. But so what? The more, the merrier, as far as I can see. How about if the U.S. DoC just creates it on its own authority, as a jesture towards international comity, and makes everyone happy?

    [To respond, or start a new comment thread, click the "Send Your Comment" button in the yellow box to the right.]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • reports
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .ie Seeks to Organize Irish Bid to Run .eu | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: .ie Seeks to Organize Irish Bid to Run .eu
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Sunday April 22 2001, @06:07PM (#555)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    Sure, and while they're at it, the DoC can create 40 other new registries (coincidentally, the number of "turned down" applicants to ICANN, each of which paid $50,000 to apply... what's the application fee for .eu?)

    --
    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .ie Seeks to Organize Irish Bid to Run .eu
    by alexander on Monday April 23 2001, @11:44AM (#561)
    User #22 Info | http://www.icannchannel.de
    I don't think ICANN is to blame for the delays -- the delay is mainly on the European side.

    Some background:
    The ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency has put "eu" on the list of reserved codes to cover any application (7-Sep-99). The ICANN BoD has decided that codes from the ISO 3166 list of reserved codes covering any application are delegable (25-Sep-00). In October 2000, Christopher Wilkinson (Commission) reported that "ICANN will need a full proposal before an agreement can be concluded with the registry operator."

    After that, an Interim Steering Group has identified several options for running the registry (10-Oct-00) and the Commission has proposed a regulation for the implementation of Dot.EU (12-Dec-00). This regulation will be considered in May (EP) and April/June (Council), according to the Commission. If all that works out, the Commission will call for proposals for running the registry. Then the Registry shall enter into a contract with ICANN, having obtained the prior consent of the Commission.

    There are still a number of Dot.EU policy questions to be solved (naming structure, price, registry modus etc etc).

    - Alexander
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com