ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Budget and Expenditures Registrar Application and Accreditation Fees Adjustment
    posted by michael on Thursday April 19 2001, @09:59AM

    twiddle writes "A few days ago ICANN staff requested public input on the topic of Registrar Application Fees and Annual Registrar Fixed Accreditation Fees (see http://www.icann.org/stockholm/registrar-fee-topic.htm).

    In the "Proposed Change in Registrar Application Fee" section, the proposal says that:

    "The fee for new registrar accreditation applications is now US$1,000. This amount is very much lower than the actual cost of processing the application. [...] ICANN proposes to raise this fee to US$2,500. [...] Staff will not have to devote time unproductively to processing applications that are not intended to go into operation in the near-term."
    I think that the staff is not sending a clear message here. What is the actual problem: the amount that cannot cover application processing costs or a large number of "non serious" applications?"




    I would really like to see first a concrete costs breakdown for the procedure of application processing. I presume that such document exists and that it's publically available. ;-) Can someone point me to that document?

    In the "Proposed Change in Annual Registrar Fixed Accreditation Fees" section, the proposal says that:

    "Registrars now pay a single fixed fee of $5,000 each year for accreditation to register for the .com, .org, and .net registries. With new unsponsored top-level domains (TLDs) planned to come on line in the near future, it would be burdensome for registrars to pay $5,000 for each additional TLD in which they perform registrar services.

    ICANN, therefore, proposes to change the fee structure to where registrars pay US$4,000 annually for the first TLD in which they are accredited to perform registrar services, and US$500 for each additional TLD."
    This seems like a reasonable thing to do at the moment, but some people think that ICANN should not put itself in between the registry operators and (accredited) registrars, and ask for even more money... :-) Other opinions?

    [To respond, or start a new comment thread, click the "Send Your Comment" button in the yellow box to the right.]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • http://www.icann.org/stockholm /registrar-fee-topic.htm
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Registrar Application and Accreditation Fees Adjustment | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Registrar Application and Accreditation Fees A
    by larry on Friday April 20 2001, @05:38AM (#550)
    User #2751 Info
    It's not reasonable.

    It was misleading of them to write "it would be burdensome for registrars to pay $5000 for EACH additional TLD..."

    First, registrars don't currently pay $5000 for A (ONE) TLD, they pay $5000 for 3 (THREE) TLD's (.com .net .org) obviously, as known, and as indicated.

    Second, there is absolutely no basis for charging additional money for additional TLD's, as ICANN doesn't have to do anything more to "certify" that a registrar can register in 3 TLD's or 300.

    It's just a way to tax registrars. Did they think they were actually going to be able to charge $5000 per TLD?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com