ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Membership Issues Touchy-Feely Study Committee
    posted by tbyfield on Friday April 13 2001, @06:53PM

    The At Large Study Committee's consensus-building process has gotten off to a ripping start. To a deftly terse remark from ICANN Blog-keeper Bret Fausett, delicately suggesting to the ALSC that they're busy inventing hot water, ALSC Executive Director Denise Michel offered a priceless gem of bureaubabble.



    Her full response is here, but the conclusion is too, too special to relegate to a URL: "If you have time, it would be helpful if you went beyond the general benefit/goal of 'representation,' and described how you see an At-Large membership (or a lack of one) impacting you, personally?"

    Her response was only the second substantive message in the ALSC's public forum, so...when it comes to the task of "unbundling" democracy, there's no flies on the ALSC.

    Note to ICANN: On your "Advisory Committees, Committees of the Board of Directors, Task Forces, and Other Committees" page (last modified 9 April), only one item is missing a link -- the At Large Membership Study Committee. C'mon, guys, the least you could do is link to your own ringers!

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • here
  • "Advisory Committees, Committees of the Board of Directors, Task Forces, and Other Committees" page
  • At Large Study Committee
  • remark
  • ICANN Blog
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Touchy-Feely Study Committee | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 5 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Touchy-Feely Study Committee
    by Sotiris on Monday April 16 2001, @05:51PM (#536)
    User #2802 Info
    Pindar Wong asked and got 400,000 USD for this? The very tone of the questons reminds me of the learning by rote moments of the kindergarten years... Not to mention the fact that I'm surprised that the people who are supposed to be conducting the study are answering back! er, that is, their `Staff' Executive Director is... Looks like a foregone conclusion to me, folk.

    As Judith Oppenheimer eloquently put it: "IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A WORLD GOVERNMENT, I WANT A REVOLUTION FIRST."

    Sotiris Sotiropoulos

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Touchy-Feely Study Committee
    by joppenheimer on Wednesday April 18 2001, @04:46PM (#543)
    User #5 Info | http://JudithOppenheimer.com
    I've been trying to figure out how to articulate my perception of Denise Michel 's dismissive response.

    Fortunately, others are less tongue-tied.

    Thomas Roessler writes, "You can, of course, restrict input into ICANN to the kind of input they get all the time on their public Web forums. This input is nice for being counted ("we had 4000 comments on this issue, we are democratic"), and for being ignored. It's pretty much useless."

    What he said.

    BTW, the ALSC dutifully posted a news release today (on businesswire, not yet on its site), titled "At-Large Study Committee Launches Online Forum."

    "A critical aspect of the committee's mission is to foster discussions that lead to consensus on the best method for ensuring that individual Internet users' voices are heard, and represented, within ICANN. This online forum will afford people throughout the world an opportunity to debate the issues involved and share their views," stated Carl Bildt, ALSC chair.

    Bildt talks about "ICANN's goal of involving and representing individuals..." They could start by acknowledging and incorporating Michael Froomkin's legitimate, common sense suggestions .

    As if.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com