Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Alternate Roots ICANN GA Chair Calls For Discussion of TLD 'Name Collisions'
    posted by michael on Thursday April 12 2001, @10:49AM

    In what may be his first official action since being 'elected' Chair of the GA and having that result ratified by the Names Council, Danny Younger has written to Name Council Chair Philip Sheppard regarding Collisions in Namespace. In this open letter Chairman Younger asks Chairman Sheppard to convene a working group to address the problem of ICANN-proposed-TLDs that collide with TLDs already in operation outside the legacy root administered by the U.S. Department of Comerce.

    It seems the GA has elected an active chair although, as the letter is careful not to take sides on the merits of the question, it may be too soon to say activist chair. Hey, give the man a week.

    Here's the text of the letter:

    To: Philip Sheppard, Names Council Chair

    There has been considerable discussion on the GA list regarding collisions in namespace. Arguments have been put forth that the ICANN Board action to accept the .biz application constitutes a policy decision which may fragment the net irrevocably. Without commenting on the merits of this claim, it is sufficient to note that domain name policy is the purview of the DNSO, and that "Constituencies or GA participants may propose that the NC consider domain name policies or recommendations."

    As two principles addressed by the White Paper, stability and competition, have been raised in the course of this debate, and whereas the Department of Commerce has previously expressed concern regarding any actions which may lead to the possibility of consumer "confusion", I now ask that the NC consider the ICANN domain name policy with respect to collision with names in the alternate root community.

    As the consequences of such NC consideration may have serious monetary repercussions for those directly impacted by any such consensus-based policy recommendation, and as such consideration may well come to also impact users of the Internet worldwide, I ask that a formal working group be convened to allow for the full and unfiltered expression of all views on this topic.

    Best regards,
    Danny Younger

    [To respond, or start a new comment thread, click the "Send Your Comment" button in the yellow box to the right.]

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • Collisions in Namespace
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN GA Chair Calls For Discussion of TLD 'Name Collisions' | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN GA Chair Calls For Discussion of TLD 'Na
    by DNSGA (icannwatch@dnsga.org) on Thursday April 12 2001, @01:42PM (#519)
    User #2791 Info | http://dnsga.org

    The DNSGA this week has attempted to determine its position regarding the matter of domain names being offered to consumers that represent the alternate root community. The DNSGA has not yet decided where it stands on this matter.

    The alternate root community appears to now threaten the stability of the DNS. This coupled with the average consumer not understanding the technical side of the DNS, and the confusion average consumers experience when registering a domain name through Registrars that compare alternative root TLDs to be at par with .com TLDs.

    It appears clear now that alternative root TLDs are not at par with .com TLDs and Registrars suggesting otherwise through marketing strategies may be considered engaged in false and misleading advertising, or deceptive advertising, by the FTC.

    By the way, the FTC appears to have begun its process of obtaining jurisdiction over the domain name industry and in defining TLDs through it consumer alert: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/domainalrt.htm

    The threat the alternate root community proposes to the .com TLDs is one that ICANN may be using to persuade ccTLDs, GAC and DOC to accept ICANN proposed agreements. In other word, ICANN may want the alternate root community threat as leverage for the advancement of its processes.

    The threat the alternate root community proposes appears to undermine the stability of the DNS and it probably is not realistic to believe that ICANN will reverse its approval of the .biz Registry, especially when ICANN believes it has government on its side.

    Where are the public comments from alternate root community representatives that describe their cure for the predictable chaos on the horizon? Have representatives from the alternate root community addressed the collision matter or is it that there will be an alternate root on every corner, in every country? If so, how will all of this work?

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN GA Chair Calls For Discussion of TLD 'Na
    by hta on Sunday April 15 2001, @02:54AM (#531)
    User #2773 Info
    One rational outcome of discussion is to decide that the collision between the PacificRoot ".biz" and the to-be-added ICANN ".biz" is PacificRoot's problem.
    Danny Younger is right to say that it is an issue that needs discussion, but the outcome is by no means certain.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: ICANN GA Chair Calls For Discussion of TLD 'Na
    by Jon_Weinberg on Thursday April 19 2001, @09:19AM (#549)
    User #16 Info | www.threecats.net
    I assume the word he meant to type was, well, "inquorate." It means "without a quorum."
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com