ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    USA Goverment Relations In the US, the Meme Tide Turns Against ICANN
    posted by michael on Monday April 09 2001, @03:51AM

    Two years ago, ICANN was sailing on the banner of privatization (and bottom-up governance, but that got lost in shuffle real quickly .....). It was supposed to be Ira Magaziner's redemptive, anti-government, move after the debacle of health care. The Internet's new "governing body" got some really good press. Not any more.



    Anthony Shadid's article in today's Boston Globe The name game: ICANN, charged with clearing up the murky water of domain naming, is under fire from every quarter, is a perfect example of the new trend. The article gives great prominence to both Congressional and public-interest critics of ICANN. Sample quote: Congressman John Dingell, Democrat of Michigan, saying that ICANN is accountable only to "God almighty."

    Indeed, commentators all over are starting to notice that this privatization is not all it was cracked up to be. Routinely, for example, commentators now (correctly) note that many of ICANN's decisions are subject to review by the U.S. department of commerce. And with the recent challenge to ICANN posed by the entrepreneurial new.net, we find that many libertarians, ordinarily receptive to all things "privatized," are having second thoughts about ICANN, because it constrains the market, and it feels like government.

    OK, maybe one article by Jesse Walker, knocking ICANN in Reason magazine hardly counts as a trend. Perhaps a more significant harbinger of a reconfiguration in the meme forest is Joe Salkowski's article, Domain Registry Group Lacks Authority, Leadership in the March, 2001 Los Angeles Business Journal (site requires cookies, content only available for a fee). This article is significant because it predates the latest flap over the VeriSign deal.

    There's nothing in there ICANNWatch readers won't have heard before but it sure doesn't pull any punches:

    • ICANN is compared to Michael Keaton role in "The Paper," an editor for a New York City tabloid who manages to stroll past a desk sergeant and into a police station without even identifying himself - except that ICANN is called "clumsy";
    • The names of the seven new gTLDs are called "lame";
    • The decision to require a non-refundable $50,000 fee is called "lamer";
    • "No act of Congress created ICANN, and no court has ever recognized its right to award domain names or, more importantly, deny them. And even if a U.S. judge gives the group the benefit of the doubt, courts in other countries might well reject a group that claims dominion over an international network just because some American bureaucrats said so."
    • "ICANN has problems of its own, including its failure to fully include representatives of the Internet-using public in its decision-making process. ...
      "You can't blame ICANN or its volunteer board members for trying to fill a leadership void on the Net, particularly when the United States government asked them to do just that. But if you're going to make claims to authority you might not have, you've got to do a pretty good job of it." Maybe I'm wrong, but we didn't hear much stuff like this in the mainstream a few years ago. Something important seems to have changed.

      The really interesting question is to what extent this will spread to other countries.

      [To respond, or start a new comment thread, click the "Send Your Comment" button in the yellow box to the right.]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • The name game: ICANN, charged with clearing up the murky water of domain naming, is under fire from every quarter
  • knocking ICANN
  • Los Angeles Business Journal
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    In the US, the Meme Tide Turns Against ICANN | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Here's one from the UK
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Tuesday April 10 2001, @02:20PM (#506)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    Not exactly anti-ICANN, but rather balanced: the BBC Net Name Chaos Grows by Mark Ward.

    It starts, "The grip of the net's ruling body on the web's system for naming and finding domains is in danger of being undermined."

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com