ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Membership Issues Bildt Committee: Something Missing?
    posted by michael on Wednesday March 07 2001, @10:02AM

    Three candidates from the recent ICANN At-Large Election suggest that the proposed membership of the At Large Membership Study Committee (aka the Bildt Committee) leaves out one essential point of view.

    In a letter to be sent tomorrow, but unveiled at today's Computers, Freedom & Privacy conference in Boston, former ACM President Barbara Simons, U. Texas Business, Technology and Law Professor Emerson Tiller and Stanford Law Professor Larry Lessig say that "The absence of an entire point of view in these debates is as obvious as it would be if the government of the state of Florida were to set up an electoral reform committee with good honest and true Republicans and Independents, but not a single Democrat."



    The missing viewpoint, of course, is that of people who actively fought for a directly elected At-Large, and who participated enthusiastically in the electoral process. The Bildt Committee includes former ICANN Board Members who voted first to eliminate direct elections, and then when that wouldn't fly, voted instead to shrink the elected at-large from nine to five seats, and it includes distinguished neutrals -- but not one of the people who strenuously opposed ICANN's positions during the controversy.

    Other key points in the letter include:

    • "Neither we nor other active supporters of the at-large community were consulted regarding the goals of the study or the composition of the committee."
    • "ICANN solicited comments on the study proposal, and we appreciate that. But since ICANN did not respond to the comments, there was no discussion, no debate, no dialogue."
    • "By contrast, there was active outreach from ICANN to the Supporting Organizations, including some groups that are opposed to the notion of an at-large membership."
    • "The creation of a study that drags on for a long period of time and that could eliminate some or all of the democratically elected at-large Board seats appears to be a strategy to avoid ICANN's original obligation - and to sap the interest of the 76,000 people from around the world who took the trouble to become at-large members."
    • "The members of the at-large and the people who opposed ICANN's attempt to prevent direct elections of their representatives have earned the right to be at the table; they should not again be relegated to the role of supplicant or object."
    The ICANN Board has already approved the appointment of Committee Chair Carl Bildt, and Vice Chairs, Chuck Costello and Pindar Wong. The ICANN Board is expected to vote on the compositon of the rest of the committee at its webcast meeting in Melbourne on March 13. The Study Committee will hold its first meeting four days earlier, on March 9...so far there is no indication that this meeting will be webcast.

    Fait accompli? Maybe not, if enough people complain to the Public Comment Forum (although there is currently no topic devoted to discussing membership of the Bildt Committee) and to the Bildt Committee General Comments and its Melbourne Meeting Comments.

    [To respond, click the "Send Your Comment" button in the yellow box to the right.]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • webcast
  • complain to the Public Comment Forum
  • Bildt Committee General Comments
  • Melbourne Meeting Comments
  • proposed membership
  • At Large Membership Study Committee
  • letter to be sent tomorrow
  • Computers, Freedom & Privacy conference
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Bildt Committee: Something Missing? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Bildt Committee: Something Missing?
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Friday March 09 2001, @10:36AM (#396)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    Pindar Wong, Vice-Chair of the Study Committee, has provided some slides about the committee and its proposed members. No surprises there. Also, at least 2 former Board members but no one from the groups that fought them. The draft report will be presented in Uraguay in September.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com